From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754633AbZBVMrf (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:47:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751069AbZBVMrY (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:47:24 -0500 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.191]:57417 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750943AbZBVMrX (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:47:23 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vpIcoMSuwuG34NG202gKlJGqYBWYFKU868sTdErDiXGymgYjPHSC5oIwvNPIEyVzt2 mDSA12qrHNl7VWFGqmvbrCVC3pLNJWwMD3JgebGla3JsqvbN4kW3OW+/MKoVZl/YBEJj +bwlIw3Ny53/d9nrKrOTbjXpPLC7kbUEXlurg= Message-ID: <49A14956.7080500@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:47:18 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090218 SUSE/3.0b2-1.1 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sitsofe Wheeler CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, Nick Kossifidis , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Bob Copeland Subject: Re: [TIP] BUG kmalloc-4096: Poison overwritten (ath5k_rx_skb_alloc) References: <20090222111807.GB5538@silver.sucs.org> <49A13E91.1090601@gmail.com> <20090222122036.GC5538@silver.sucs.org> In-Reply-To: <20090222122036.GC5538@silver.sucs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22.2.2009 13:20, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:01:21PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> The unsupported jumbo message might be a clue. When we jump to the next: >> label, the buffer is at the end of the list in software, while in >> hardware it isn't. In theory, we might hit the bug with rx buffers >> exhaustion, because the test (bf_last == bf) doesn't work as expected then. > > This seems to be happening somewhat regularly now - I've got a small > collections of the warnings (I'll include them below in case they are > any help): [...] > [11207.741042] Object 0xd7060000: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk > [11207.741071] Object 0xd7060010: 80 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 30 ab 1a 32 3f ....ÿÿÿÿÿÿ.0«.2? All of them are almost the same scenario, the last one was data not beacon, but it's irrelevant. And previously I was wrong, we move the buffer to the end even on hardware side. Thanks so far, I personally see no reason for this to happen yet.