Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm, kprobes: fault.c, simplify notify_page_fault()

[Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>]

Hi Ingo,

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> another very small thing, while we are discussing kprobes:
> 
> I always found that the __kprobes annotation is very confusingly 
> euphemistic: what those annotations really mean is not 
> 'kprobes', but 'no kprobes'.

As far as I know, __kprobes originally means 'this function will be
called from kprobes'. However, now many functions are tagged as
__kprobes, it might be confusingly.

> So how about renaming __kprobes to __nokprobes, similar to how 
> we have the notrace attribute?

Would you mean that will include changing section name of
'.text.kprobes'? That's what I mind.

> We have about 350 __kprobes annotations in the kernel, so 
> renaming it now would not be practical - but any objections 
> against me sending Linus a rename patch somewhere late in the 
> next merge window that just does this rename?

Just renaming __kprobes to __nokprobes seems good for me.

Thank you!


> [ likewise, i'll rename notrace to __notrace to make it visually 
>   less intrusive to the return value type. There's a lot less 
>   such annotations in the kernel. ]
> 
> 	Ingo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com