From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754649AbZBXINE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:13:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752000AbZBXIMv (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:12:51 -0500 Received: from cuda1.bluetone.cz ([212.158.128.5]:35597 "EHLO mail.bluetone.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751111AbZBXIMv (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:12:51 -0500 Message-ID: <49A3AC14.2050107@slax.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:13:08 +0100 From: Tomas M User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: New filesystem for Linux kernel References: <7558.1235374266@jrobl> <7769.1235374482@jrobl> <49A268A7.1010708@slax.org> <49A26ACC.90804@slax.org> In-Reply-To: <49A26ACC.90804@slax.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org An overview of aufs2 has been submitted to this list. I noticed zero response at all. Nobody cares? I suggest to remove unionfs from Andrew's -mm tree and replace it by aufs2! Tell me why this should not happen... I write this in the hope that a debate will start... Thank you Tomas M slax.org