From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756019AbZBZF3x (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:29:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751391AbZBZF3p (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:29:45 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:47106 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750836AbZBZF3o (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:29:44 -0500 Message-ID: <49A62899.4080001@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:28:57 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Harvey Harrison , Cyrill Gorcunov , Andrew Morton , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC] introduce pr_cont macro References: <20090225205920.GA22091@localhost> <20090226030315.GB7526@elte.hu> <1235617541.5610.0.camel@brick> <20090226031301.GE7526@elte.hu> <1235618574.5610.1.camel@brick> <20090226032544.GB22223@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090226032544.GB22223@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Btw., why do those macros use ##__VA_ARGS__ ? Why not a > straightforward: > > #define __pr_cont(args...) \ > printk(KERN_CONT args) > Don't know if anyone cares, but __VA_ARGS__ is C99 whereas args... is a gcc extension, AFAIK. -hpa