Re: [RFC] introduce pr_cont macro

Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-26T06:51:48Z

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:28 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> Btw., why do those macros use ##__VA_ARGS__ ? Why not a straightforward:
>>
>> #define __pr_cont(args...) \
>> printk(KERN_CONT args)
>>
>
> Don't know if anyone cares, but __VA_ARGS__ is C99 whereas args... is a gcc
> extension, AFAIK.
>
> -hpa
>

I think in a sake of consistency better would be using __VA_ARGS__ here
too (since all prevous pr_...'s use it).