From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Li Wei <W.Li@Sun.COM>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:46:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A6812F.4030303@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235643104.13052.10.camel@localhost>
Li Wei wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 13:47 +0100, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
>> +/* write() implementation for reset file. Reset all profiling data to zero
>> + * and remove ghost nodes. */
>> +static ssize_t reset_write(struct file *file, const char __user *addr,
>> + size_t len, loff_t *pos)
>> +{
>> + struct gcov_node *node;
>> + struct gcov_node *r;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&node_lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(node, r, &all_head, all) {
>> + if (node->info)
>> + gcov_info_reset(node->info);
>> + else
>> + remove_node(node);
>> + }
>> + mutex_unlock(&node_lock);
>> +
>> + return len;
>> +}
>
> The remove_node above may have deleted the node that r points at. How
> about replacing all_head with a leaves_head that contains all leaf
> nodes, and iterate the latter instead?
You're right again - with the fix for node->parent I'm running into
kernel oopses because of this problem. But instead of creating and
maintaining a new new leaf-nodes list, I'd prefer simply restarting
the loop when remove_node has been called. This results in a bit more
computing effort but doesn't increase data complexity any more than
necessary. My proposed fix looks something like this (unless there
are objections, I'll include this one in the re-post):
---
kernel/gcov/fs.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.29-rc6/kernel/gcov/fs.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.29-rc6.orig/kernel/gcov/fs.c
+++ linux-2.6.29-rc6/kernel/gcov/fs.c
@@ -453,15 +453,22 @@ static ssize_t reset_write(struct file *
size_t len, loff_t *pos)
{
struct gcov_node *node;
- struct gcov_node *r;
+ int restart;
mutex_lock(&node_lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(node, r, &all_head, all) {
- if (node->info)
- gcov_info_reset(node->info);
- else
- remove_node(node);
- }
+ do {
+ restart = 0;
+ list_for_each_entry(node, &all_head, all) {
+ if (node->info)
+ gcov_info_reset(node->info);
+ else if (list_empty(&node->children)) {
+ remove_node(node);
+ /* Several nodes may have gone - restart. */
+ restart = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ } while (restart);
mutex_unlock(&node_lock);
return len;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-26 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-03 12:47 [PATCH 3/4] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure Peter Oberparleiter
2009-02-03 15:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 16:48 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-02-26 2:40 ` Li Wei
2009-02-26 10:00 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-02-26 10:33 ` Li Wei
2009-02-26 12:57 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-02-26 10:11 ` Li Wei
2009-02-26 11:46 ` Peter Oberparleiter [this message]
2009-02-26 12:08 ` Li Wei
2009-02-26 12:55 ` Peter Oberparleiter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-26 13:52 Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-07 12:45 [PATCH 0/4] gcov kernel support Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-07 12:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-07 13:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-08 11:10 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-11 13:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 13:09 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-12 13:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-08 15:44 [PATCH 0/4] gcov kernel support Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-08 15:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-12 15:38 [PATCH 0/4] gcov kernel support Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-12 15:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-19 14:24 [PATCH 0/4] gcov kernel support Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-19 14:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-19 15:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-22 8:55 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-05-22 9:22 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-02 11:43 [PATCH 0/4] gcov kernel support Peter Oberparleiter
2009-06-02 11:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] gcov: add gcov profiling infrastructure Peter Oberparleiter
2009-06-02 22:03 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-03 2:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-06-03 11:57 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-06-03 15:26 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-06-03 16:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-06-03 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-04 8:26 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-06-04 8:40 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-05 13:05 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-06-04 9:08 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-06-05 9:23 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-06-05 9:34 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-05 10:12 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-06-06 8:30 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-06-08 8:24 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2009-06-05 9:55 ` Amerigo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A6812F.4030303@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=oberpar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=W.Li@Sun.COM \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).