public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29-rc6
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:47:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A78C79.304@krogh.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235687483.6811.26.camel@localhost.localdomain>

john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 23:06 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, john stultz wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 22:35 +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>>>>> Also mind sending the full dmesg for both kernels?
>>>> http://krogh.cc/~jesper/dmesg-2.6.29-rc6.txt
>>>> http://krogh.cc/~jesper/dmesg-2.6.26.8.txt
>>> So one interesting difference:
>>> 2.6.26.8:	TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER
>>> 2.6.29-rc6:	Fast TSC calibration using PIT
>>>
>>> Thomas, any thoughts as to why we might be calibrating off the PIT
>>> instead of the PM_TIMER w/ 2.6.29?
>> Yup, because we introduced the Fast PIT calibration in 2.6.28.
> 
> Ah. Ok.
> 
>> Is the delta anything NTP might get upset about:
>>
>> 2.6.26: time.c: Detected 2311.847 MHz processor.
>> 2.6.29: Detected 2310.029 MHz processor.
> 
> I wouldn't think so.
> 
> Although, I'm recalling on some systems here right after we deploy them
> we'll see something similar to the originally reported ntpd "time reset"
> noise for a period of time while ntpd tries to find the right freq. For
> some reason, I've noticed, having multiple servers in your ntp.conf
> seems to increase NTP's difficulty at picking a time and converging. 
> 
> So this may be just the slight calibration change is confusing ntp or it
> may be the NTP_INTERVAL_LENGTH change from awhile back which would cause
> the drift value to change could be doing the same thing (although I
> thought that landed in the 2.6.24 timeframe, but I may be forgetting).
> 
> I'll kick up some of my own testing between these two releases to see if
> I can't find something similar.
> 
> Jesper: How long was the box up for when you noticed the ntpd noise?

I was booted Feb 25 21:58 .. the first noice from ntp starts here:
Feb 25 22:09:53 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to LOCAL(0), stratum 13
Feb 25 22:09:56 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to 10.194.133.13, stratum 4
Feb 25 22:14:08 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to LOCAL(0), stratum 13
Feb 25 22:16:20 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to 10.194.133.13, stratum 4
Feb 25 22:32:25 quad12 ntpd[4901]: time reset -1.601641 s
Feb 25 22:36:18 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to LOCAL(0), stratum 13
Feb 25 22:36:45 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to 10.194.133.12, stratum 4
Feb 25 22:51:41 quad12 ntpd[4901]: time reset -0.922993 s
Feb 25 22:55:05 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to LOCAL(0), stratum 13



> Also what's the output of the following under the different kernels:
> ntpdc -c peers
> ntpdc -c kerninfo

Working (clocksource=acpi_pm) 2.6.29-rc6
jk@quad02:~$ ntpdc -c kerninfo
pll offset:           -0.001577 s
pll frequency:        -45.787 ppm
maximum error:        0.066739 s
estimated error:      0.000768 s
status:               0001  pll
pll time constant:    6
precision:            1e-06 s
frequency tolerance:  500 ppm
jk@quad02:~$ ntpdc -c peers
      remote           local      st poll reach  delay   offset    disp
=======================================================================
*hal.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.81    4   64  377 0.00008  0.003752 0.04816
=svn.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.81    4   64  377 0.00009 -0.008724 0.04979
=LOCAL(0)        127.0.0.1       13   64  377 0.00000  0.000000 0.03082


Working (clocksource=tsc) 2.6.26.8
jk@quad03:~$ ntpdc -c kerninfo
pll offset:           0.003208 s
pll frequency:        -25.070 ppm
maximum error:        0.833193 s
estimated error:      0.002787 s
status:               4001  pll
pll time constant:    10
precision:            1e-06 s
frequency tolerance:  500 ppm
jk@quad03:~$ ntpdc -c peers
      remote           local      st poll reach  delay   offset    disp
=======================================================================
*hal.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.82    4 1024  377 0.00781  0.006788 0.13666
=sal.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.82    4 1024  377 0.00018 -0.000541 0.12175
=LOCAL(0)        127.0.0.1       13   64  377 0.00000  0.000000 0.03041

Non-working (clocksource=tsc) 2.6.29-rc6
jk@quad12:~$ ntpdc -c kerninfo
pll offset:           0 s
pll frequency:        -34.754 ppm
maximum error:        0.023514 s
estimated error:      0 s
status:               0001  pll
pll time constant:    6
precision:            1e-06 s
frequency tolerance:  500 ppm
jk@quad12:~$ ntpdc -c peers
      remote           local      st poll reach  delay   offset    disp
=======================================================================
=hal.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.91    4   64   17 0.00011 -0.069377 0.96895
=trac.nzcorp.net 10.194.132.91    4   64   17 0.00011 -0.096107 0.96904
*LOCAL(0)        127.0.0.1       13   64   17 0.00000  0.000000 0.96857


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-27  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-23  4:31 Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Linus Torvalds
2009-02-23 14:07 ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 - Fix oops in i915_gem_retire_requests Karsten Wiese
2009-02-26 11:15 ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 17:17   ` MTD_CK804XROM warning (Was: Linux 2.6.29-rc6) Marcin Slusarz
2009-02-26 17:53   ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 19:22     ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:31     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:36       ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:46         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:49           ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 20:53         ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-02-26 20:32       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 19:55 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 20:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 20:43     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:19       ` john stultz
2009-02-26 21:35         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:46           ` john stultz
2009-02-26 21:54             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 22:04               ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27  6:30             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 13:51             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:49           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-01 15:04             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:54           ` john stultz
2009-02-26 22:06             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 22:24               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 22:31                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 22:31               ` john stultz
2009-02-26 22:40                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 22:59                   ` john stultz
2009-02-27  7:33                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-27 20:50                       ` john stultz
2009-02-27  6:47                 ` Jesper Krogh [this message]
2009-02-27 20:35                   ` john stultz
2009-03-01 20:13                     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-02  9:53                     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-02 21:27                       ` john stultz
2009-03-03  6:04                         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-03 19:53                           ` john stultz
2009-03-03 20:19                             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-03 22:22                               ` john stultz
2009-03-04 15:30                                 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-04 18:36                                   ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-04 18:57                                     ` John Stultz
2009-03-05  2:39                                       ` john stultz
2009-03-05  2:52                                         ` john stultz
2009-03-05  8:43                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-06  3:13                                             ` john stultz
2009-03-06  3:54                                               ` john stultz
2009-03-06 11:34                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-09 20:42                                           ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-10  4:26                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-10 11:29                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-10 19:42                                                 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-10 22:22                                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-15 19:53                                                     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 18:40                                                       ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-15  1:19                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-15 15:44                                               ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-15 18:09                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-15 18:38                                                   ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-15 19:02                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-15 19:52                                                       ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 18:59                                                         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 19:32                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17  1:43                                                             ` john stultz
2009-03-17  8:14                                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 15:48                                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 16:13                                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 16:28                                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 16:40                                                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 17:28                                                                   ` Olivier Galibert
2009-03-21  9:11                                                             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-21 10:06                                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 20:32                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-03 20:39                             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-03 22:16                               ` john stultz
2009-03-04  5:36                                 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 15:09   ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 15:44     ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 (clocksource) Sitsofe Wheeler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49A78C79.304@krogh.cc \
    --to=jesper@krogh.cc \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox