From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Simple brk allocator for very early allocations
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:30:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A8D9F2.703@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227212313.a6b4b43c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:51:17 -0800 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>
>
>> This series adds a very simple brk-like allocator for very early
>> allocations. By default it extends the bss segment, starting at _end.
>>
>> This is used to allocate x86-32's initial head_32.S pagetable, removing
>> init_pg_table_start/end and pg0, replacing them with brk allocations.
>>
>
> Changelog fails to provide a reason for this?
>
Well, the whole thing is just a generalization of what the 32-bit
pagetable builder does anyway, to make it more useful. With the brk
allocator in place, there's no reason for head_32.S to do it again.
>> dmi_alloc() is also changed to use extend_brk.
>>
>
> Seems a large patchset just to clean up DMI a bit ;)
>
A few patches could be folded together. But its pretty small really...
> I assume that xen needs this? domU or dom0
I can make use of it in Xen to remove a bunch of static arrays. I'm
pretty sure there's quite a few places around the kernel which could
make use of this facility. My kernel has 900k of bss; how much of that
is stuff that 1) could be allocated, and 2) not actually being used at
runtime? A lot of things which are compile-time sized, hash tables, log
buffers, etc, could be runtime sized instead.
J
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-28 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-28 1:51 [PATCH] Simple brk allocator for very early allocations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 1:51 ` [PATCH] x86: add brk allocation for very, " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 1:51 ` [PATCH] x86: reserve brk earlier Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 1:51 ` [PATCH] x86-32: use brk segment for allocating initial kernel pagetable Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 7:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28 7:05 ` J Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 7:15 ` J Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28 7:39 ` does boot loader check uncompressed kernel size? Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28 7:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-28 7:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28 8:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-28 20:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28 7:52 ` brk patches Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28 8:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-28 8:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 20:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 23:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-02 1:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-02 1:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-02 1:16 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-02 1:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-02 1:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-02 2:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 1:23 ` [PATCH] x86: put initial_pg_tables into bss Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 8:31 ` [PATCH] x86: put initial_pg_tables into bss -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 9:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-01 17:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 18:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 23:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-02 0:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-09 8:15 ` [PATCH] x86: put initial_pg_tables into .bss -v4 Yinghai Lu
2009-03-09 15:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-09 17:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-09 18:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-11 1:39 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-09 7:45 ` [PATCH] x86: put initial_pg_tables into bss -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28 8:07 ` does boot loader check uncompressed kernel size? H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-28 8:17 ` J Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 7:30 ` J Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28 1:51 ` [PATCH] x86: use brk allocation for DMI Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 1:51 ` [PATCH] x86: leave _brk_end defined Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 5:23 ` [PATCH] Simple brk allocator for very early allocations Andrew Morton
2009-02-28 6:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A8D9F2.703@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox