From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756160AbZCAKo1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2009 05:44:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752482AbZCAKoP (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2009 05:44:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f177.google.com ([209.85.219.177]:59636 "EHLO mail-ew0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752273AbZCAKoO (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Mar 2009 05:44:14 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Tjc3z5WQIG2doOBnENUh8N2gJctrzcMClwjDiTk1qezoJ4GV/3XDeznGJQ/skrKCTS pEnaAw8W9OzGOXaJc7IRC25AYf7JRSf5Xg28+OAmG252l8AWL3ox/uquPd6cjyf0/VEH Rvj4/wFeULNGhIcRHEFROPzhuAEa/EczW30ps= Message-ID: <49AA66CE.7080506@panasas.com> Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:43:26 +0200 From: Boaz Harrosh User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FUJITA Tomonori CC: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avishay@gmail.com, osd-dev@open-osd.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH 1/8] exofs: Kbuild, Headers and osd utils References: <49993FF2.9050200@panasas.com> <20090217092042C.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <499A70E7.4000405@panasas.com> <20090227170931Z.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20090227170931Z.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:10:15 +0200 > Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>> Can you stop the argument, "exofs is similar to the existing >>> traditional file systems hence it should be treated equally". It's >>> simply untrue. Does anyone except for panasas people insist the same >>> argument? >>> >> No I will not, it is true. exofs is just a regular old filesystem >> nothing different. > > After reading this, I gave up discussing this issue with you but I > still wait for your fixes that you promised: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123445759718253&w=2 > > > Thanks, > -- They are on the way, I have not forgotten Boaz