public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: brk patches..
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:16:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AB3377.40904@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49AB316E.4000009@zytor.com>

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> If the brk is bounded-size on the same order or smaller as the kernel,
> we should just mark it as an unallocated (bss) section in the ELF image
> and be done with it... there really is no point in trying to be smarter
> (we'd be subject to failures to load the kernel proper.)  If the brk is
> significantly bigger, then yes, we need to be smarter.  However, that is
> not my current understanding of the requirements.
>   

Yes, right.  And in my case I actually need it to generate an 
appropriate e820 table, so adding a dependency on e820 would be circular...

(To be specific: I reshape the guest e820 table so that it doesn't have 
memory in any forbidden areas of the host e820 table.  That may require 
moving the pseudo-physical address of pages into a new overflow e820 
entry, which would also require allocating pages for the p2m radix tree.)

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-02  1:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-28  1:51 [PATCH] Simple brk allocator for very early allocations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28  1:51 ` [PATCH] x86: add brk allocation for very, " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28  1:51 ` [PATCH] x86: reserve brk earlier Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28  1:51 ` [PATCH] x86-32: use brk segment for allocating initial kernel pagetable Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28  7:02   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28  7:05     ` J Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28  7:15       ` J Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28  7:39         ` does boot loader check uncompressed kernel size? Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28  7:47           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-28  7:54             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28  8:08               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-28 20:42                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28  7:52           ` brk patches Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28  8:08             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-28  8:17             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28 20:40               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 23:53                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-02  1:02                   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-02  1:07                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-02  1:16                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-03-02  1:36                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-02  1:54                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-02  2:12                             ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01  1:23               ` [PATCH] x86: put initial_pg_tables into bss Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01  8:31                 ` [PATCH] x86: put initial_pg_tables into bss -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01  9:20                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-01 17:49                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 18:06                     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 23:29                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-02  0:55                         ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-09  8:15                           ` [PATCH] x86: put initial_pg_tables into .bss -v4 Yinghai Lu
2009-03-09 15:41                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-09 17:35                               ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-09 18:28                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-11  1:39                                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-09  7:45                         ` [PATCH] x86: put initial_pg_tables into bss -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28  8:07           ` does boot loader check uncompressed kernel size? H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-28  8:17         ` J Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28  7:30       ` J Yinghai Lu
2009-02-28  1:51 ` [PATCH] x86: use brk allocation for DMI Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28  1:51 ` [PATCH] x86: leave _brk_end defined Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-28  5:23 ` [PATCH] Simple brk allocator for very early allocations Andrew Morton
2009-02-28  6:30   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49AB3377.40904@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox