From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753589AbZCBOP3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:15:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751809AbZCBOPU (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:15:20 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:43074 "EHLO mail-fx0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751789AbZCBOPS (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:15:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PzIC8g4BBCBUmWF0bwWMU5tIhIGx6yOlEEUj/8uw5AUzOfAmWMcHon5un2qw0iD5ta tXTcaWj3yx+yNSRg1/852UgZrlgdJONF7iNFaGCIDD+769u4+veUAZcyK1kuECdBdZ2g HBWh11Le11St7q8hu0OslRTGpM1jSCL/WWMtI= Message-ID: <49ABE9F1.9060201@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:15:13 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 SUSE/3.0b2-3.1 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: Accelerated touchscreen support for Marvell Zylonite References: <1236000228-13025-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <49ABE2BC.9010401@gmail.com> <20090302140044.GA23038@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> In-Reply-To: <20090302140044.GA23038@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2.3.2009 15:00, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:44:28PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> On 2.3.2009 14:23, Mark Brown wrote: >>> + int count = 16; >>> + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1); [...] >>> + while (count< 16) { > >> Weird condition. >> + conding style > > Hrm. This appears to have been mangled somewhere in the mail path to > you - the indentation is normal in my send-mail folder and in the copy I > got back from the list. OK, anyway the condition looks weird on a semantic layer. >>> +static void wm97xx_irq_enable(struct wm97xx *wm, int enable) >>> +{ >>> + if (enable) >>> + enable_irq(wm->pen_irq); >>> + else >>> + disable_irq(wm->pen_irq); > >> sync? > > Could you expand on this, please? No, I was wrong, ignore this one. It's called from within the interrupt it disables.