[PATCH 3/5] epoll: remove unnecessary xchg

[Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>]

xchg in ep_unregister_pollwait() is unnecessary because it is protected
by either epmutex or ep->mtx (the same protection as ep_remove()).
If xchg wasn't unnecessary, it would be insufficient to protect against
problems.  If multiple concurrent calls to ep_unregister_pollwait()
were possible, then a second caller that returns without doing anything
because nwait == 0 could return before the waitqueues are removed
by the first caller, which looks like it could lead to problematic
races with ep_poll_callback().  So remove xchg and add comments about
the locking.

Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Acked-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
---
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c	2009-02-23 13:26:53.000000000 -0500
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c	2009-02-23 13:29:31.000000000 -0500
@@ -413,27 +413,21 @@ static void ep_poll_safewake(wait_queue_
 }
 
 /*
- * This function unregister poll callbacks from the associated file descriptor.
- * Since this must be called without holding "ep->lock" the atomic exchange trick
- * will protect us from multiple unregister.
+ * This function unregisters poll callbacks from the associated file
+ * descriptor.  Must be called with "mtx" held (or "epmutex" if called from
+ * ep_free).
  */
 static void ep_unregister_pollwait(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
 {
-	int nwait;
 	struct list_head *lsthead = &epi->pwqlist;
 	struct eppoll_entry *pwq;
 
-	/* This is called without locks, so we need the atomic exchange */
-	nwait = xchg(&epi->nwait, 0);
+	while (!list_empty(lsthead)) {
+		pwq = list_first_entry(lsthead, struct eppoll_entry, llink);
 
-	if (nwait) {
-		while (!list_empty(lsthead)) {
-			pwq = list_first_entry(lsthead, struct eppoll_entry, llink);
-
-			list_del_init(&pwq->llink);
-			remove_wait_queue(pwq->whead, &pwq->wait);
-			kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
-		}
+		list_del(&pwq->llink);
+		remove_wait_queue(pwq->whead, &pwq->wait);
+		kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
 	}
 }