From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756066AbZCDJah (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 04:30:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752362AbZCDJa2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 04:30:28 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:58380 "EHLO mail-fx0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750786AbZCDJa1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 04:30:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=o/YRQODepfcSYx62dVrwlXSaxBBonVmJCFtdnIAqNkVAZMfELDUV1j6j+Ei9rgQ9IJ XeyCkiCX5NjvAVW5VxhzfDcbaDhgo4+usa/lie6qAeEybz+Z425DP2zh1FT6KJkQoXBi eP9pITUmyGiBrcfn53oJ4Z+Cgs1KpH91R/Nsg= Message-ID: <49AE4A2E.8090300@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:30:22 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 SUSE/3.0b2-3.1 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: hid-dummy.ko Input/output error -- causing huge delays References: <43e72e890903021737v7f5c4f06lb13e4f5d3ad67fd7@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890903021751m3f17206dge880dfc4d2c56711@mail.gmail.com> <49AD17DD.1030206@gmail.com> <43e72e890903031607k4e2ce36csb7c48de2f01a6de6@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890903031738w12a726d4ga3f998d8e4263a73@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43e72e890903031738w12a726d4ga3f998d8e4263a73@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4.3.2009 02:38, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Well now I see FC10 say its starting udev and it just sits there > waiting for the same period of time so maybe it was that (?). But at > the console the hid-dummy is not the last message I see now, but I > guess I wouldn't because it returns 0 now huh. Sorry, I'm totally confused now :). What you wouldn't? Actually I saw similar behavior on one of my boxes. I'll recheck if it is still present. Thanks so far.