public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 pat issue
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:56:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AE5039.5050105@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090304060857.GA18318@linux-os.sc.intel.com>

Hi!

Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 01:43:08AM -0800, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>   
>> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>     
>>> Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Indeed, it's crucial to keep the mappings consistent, but failure to do so is a
>>>> kernel driver bug, it should never be the result of invalid user data.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> It easily can be.  Think of an X server mmaping frame buffers. Or other
>>> device bars.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> Hmm, Yes  you're right, although I'm still a bit doubtful about RAM pages.
>>
>> Wait. Now I see what's causing the problems. The code is  assuming that
>> VM_PFNMAP vmas never map RAM pages. That's also an invalid assumption.
>> See comments in mm/memory.c
>>
>> So probably the attribute check should be done for the insert_pfn path
>> of VM_MIXEDMAP as well. That's not done today.
>>
>> So there are three distinct bugs at this point:
>>
>> 1) VMAs with VM_PFNMAP are incorrectly assumed to be linear if
>> vma->vm_pgoff non-null.
>> 2) VM_PFNMAP VMA PTEs are incorrectly assumed to never point to physical
>> RAM.
>> 3) There is no check for the insert_pfn  path of vm_insert_mixed().
>>
>>     
>
> Patch below will solve (1) above.
>   

Yes, hmm, but how about remap_pfn_range() having an optimized function 
to call into directly, instead of
track_pfn_vma_new?

> About (2), Yes. we can optimize the PAT code if we use struct page to track
> PFNMAP as long at memory is backed by a struct page. It has some complications
> with refcounting the number of mappings and related things. We are actively
> looking at it. 

Cool. Still, there needs to be a check for non-io pages in vm_insert_pfn 
to avoid hitting the WARN_ON_ONCE:
+ if (!pfn_valid(pfn)) //Pfn pointing to a non-ram page.
    track_pfn_vma_new()

> About (3), vm_insert_mixed was not used by any in kernel driver,
> so, we did not add checks there, with the intention of fixing most commonly
> used remap_pfn_range and vm_insert_pfn first.
>
> Below patch should fix the regression upstream. 

Not completely, I think the above check is needed for (2) as well.

> I don't like the way we
> overloaded a bit here. But, we don't seem to see any other option.
> Nick: Do you see any cleaner way to do this?
>
> Thanks,
> Venki
>
>   

Thanks,
Thomas


> Subject: [PATCH] VM, x86 PAT: Change implementation of is_linear_pfn_mapping
>
> Use of vma->vm_pgoff to identify the pfnmaps that are fully mapped at
> mmap time is broken, as vm_pgoff can also be set when full mapping is
> not setup at mmap time.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123383810628583&w=2
>
> Change the logic to overload VM_NONLINEAR flag along with VM_PFNMAP to
> mean full mapping setup at mmap time. This distinction is needed by x86 PAT
> code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h |    8 +++++++-
>  mm/memory.c        |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 065cdf8..6c3fc3a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -127,6 +127,12 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
>  #define VM_SPECIAL (VM_IO | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP)
>  
>  /*
> + * pfnmap vmas that are fully mapped at mmap time (not mapped on fault).
> + * Used by x86 PAT to identify such PFNMAP mappings and optimize their handling.
> + */
> +#define VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP (VM_NONLINEAR | VM_PFNMAP)
> +
> +/*
>   * mapping from the currently active vm_flags protection bits (the
>   * low four bits) to a page protection mask..
>   */
> @@ -145,7 +151,7 @@ extern pgprot_t protection_map[16];
>   */
>  static inline int is_linear_pfn_mapping(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  {
> -	return ((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) && vma->vm_pgoff);
> +	return ((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP) == VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP);
>  }
>  
>  static inline int is_pfn_mapping(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index baa999e..457e97e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1671,6 +1671,7 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP;
> +	vma->vm_flags |= VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP;
>  
>  	err = track_pfn_vma_new(vma, &prot, pfn, PAGE_ALIGN(size));
>  	if (err) {
> @@ -1679,6 +1680,7 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>  		 * needed from higher level routine calling unmap_vmas
>  		 */
>  		vma->vm_flags &= ~(VM_IO | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP);
> +		vma->vm_flags &= ~VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP;
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-04  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-05 12:47 2.6.29 pat issue Thomas Hellström
2009-02-05 18:03 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-05 21:32   ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-02-05 23:08     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-06  9:51       ` Thomas Hellström
2009-02-06  1:11     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-06  9:43       ` Thomas Hellström
2009-03-04  6:08         ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-04  9:56           ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]
2009-03-06 22:38             ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-06 23:44               ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-10  1:39                 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-10  8:22                   ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-10 17:42                     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-11  9:17                       ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-11  9:33                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 17:54                           ` [PATCH] VM, x86, PAT: Change implementation of is_linear_pfn_mapping Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-11 22:09                             ` Frans Pop
2009-03-12  0:31                               ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-12  3:22                                 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-12  5:45                                 ` Frans Pop
2009-03-12 18:59                                   ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-12 20:30                                     ` Frans Pop
2009-03-12 22:48                                       ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-13  0:36                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13  0:45                                           ` [PATCH] VM, x86, PAT: Change is_linear_pfn_mapping to not use vm_pgoff Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-13  4:03                                             ` [tip:x86/urgent] " Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-13 16:25                                               ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 17:00                                                 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-14  2:52                                                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 23:35                                                 ` [PATCH] Add a new vm flag to track full pfnmap at mmap Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-14  2:53                                                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-14  8:54                                                   ` [tip:x86/urgent] VM, x86, PAT: add " Pallipadi, Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49AE5039.5050105@vmware.com \
    --to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox