From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 pat issue
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:56:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AE5039.5050105@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090304060857.GA18318@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Hi!
Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 01:43:08AM -0800, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
>> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>>> Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Indeed, it's crucial to keep the mappings consistent, but failure to do so is a
>>>> kernel driver bug, it should never be the result of invalid user data.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It easily can be. Think of an X server mmaping frame buffers. Or other
>>> device bars.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hmm, Yes you're right, although I'm still a bit doubtful about RAM pages.
>>
>> Wait. Now I see what's causing the problems. The code is assuming that
>> VM_PFNMAP vmas never map RAM pages. That's also an invalid assumption.
>> See comments in mm/memory.c
>>
>> So probably the attribute check should be done for the insert_pfn path
>> of VM_MIXEDMAP as well. That's not done today.
>>
>> So there are three distinct bugs at this point:
>>
>> 1) VMAs with VM_PFNMAP are incorrectly assumed to be linear if
>> vma->vm_pgoff non-null.
>> 2) VM_PFNMAP VMA PTEs are incorrectly assumed to never point to physical
>> RAM.
>> 3) There is no check for the insert_pfn path of vm_insert_mixed().
>>
>>
>
> Patch below will solve (1) above.
>
Yes, hmm, but how about remap_pfn_range() having an optimized function
to call into directly, instead of
track_pfn_vma_new?
> About (2), Yes. we can optimize the PAT code if we use struct page to track
> PFNMAP as long at memory is backed by a struct page. It has some complications
> with refcounting the number of mappings and related things. We are actively
> looking at it.
Cool. Still, there needs to be a check for non-io pages in vm_insert_pfn
to avoid hitting the WARN_ON_ONCE:
+ if (!pfn_valid(pfn)) //Pfn pointing to a non-ram page.
track_pfn_vma_new()
> About (3), vm_insert_mixed was not used by any in kernel driver,
> so, we did not add checks there, with the intention of fixing most commonly
> used remap_pfn_range and vm_insert_pfn first.
>
> Below patch should fix the regression upstream.
Not completely, I think the above check is needed for (2) as well.
> I don't like the way we
> overloaded a bit here. But, we don't seem to see any other option.
> Nick: Do you see any cleaner way to do this?
>
> Thanks,
> Venki
>
>
Thanks,
Thomas
> Subject: [PATCH] VM, x86 PAT: Change implementation of is_linear_pfn_mapping
>
> Use of vma->vm_pgoff to identify the pfnmaps that are fully mapped at
> mmap time is broken, as vm_pgoff can also be set when full mapping is
> not setup at mmap time.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123383810628583&w=2
>
> Change the logic to overload VM_NONLINEAR flag along with VM_PFNMAP to
> mean full mapping setup at mmap time. This distinction is needed by x86 PAT
> code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 8 +++++++-
> mm/memory.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 065cdf8..6c3fc3a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -127,6 +127,12 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
> #define VM_SPECIAL (VM_IO | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP)
>
> /*
> + * pfnmap vmas that are fully mapped at mmap time (not mapped on fault).
> + * Used by x86 PAT to identify such PFNMAP mappings and optimize their handling.
> + */
> +#define VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP (VM_NONLINEAR | VM_PFNMAP)
> +
> +/*
> * mapping from the currently active vm_flags protection bits (the
> * low four bits) to a page protection mask..
> */
> @@ -145,7 +151,7 @@ extern pgprot_t protection_map[16];
> */
> static inline int is_linear_pfn_mapping(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> - return ((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) && vma->vm_pgoff);
> + return ((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP) == VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP);
> }
>
> static inline int is_pfn_mapping(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index baa999e..457e97e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1671,6 +1671,7 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP;
> + vma->vm_flags |= VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP;
>
> err = track_pfn_vma_new(vma, &prot, pfn, PAGE_ALIGN(size));
> if (err) {
> @@ -1679,6 +1680,7 @@ int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> * needed from higher level routine calling unmap_vmas
> */
> vma->vm_flags &= ~(VM_IO | VM_RESERVED | VM_PFNMAP);
> + vma->vm_flags &= ~VM_PFNMAP_AT_MMAP;
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-04 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-05 12:47 2.6.29 pat issue Thomas Hellström
2009-02-05 18:03 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-05 21:32 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-02-05 23:08 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-06 9:51 ` Thomas Hellström
2009-02-06 1:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-06 9:43 ` Thomas Hellström
2009-03-04 6:08 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-04 9:56 ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]
2009-03-06 22:38 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-06 23:44 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-10 1:39 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-10 8:22 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-10 17:42 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-11 9:17 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-11 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 17:54 ` [PATCH] VM, x86, PAT: Change implementation of is_linear_pfn_mapping Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-11 22:09 ` Frans Pop
2009-03-12 0:31 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-12 3:22 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-12 5:45 ` Frans Pop
2009-03-12 18:59 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-12 20:30 ` Frans Pop
2009-03-12 22:48 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-13 0:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 0:45 ` [PATCH] VM, x86, PAT: Change is_linear_pfn_mapping to not use vm_pgoff Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-13 4:03 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-13 16:25 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 17:00 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-14 2:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 23:35 ` [PATCH] Add a new vm flag to track full pfnmap at mmap Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-14 2:53 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-14 8:54 ` [tip:x86/urgent] VM, x86, PAT: add " Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49AE5039.5050105@vmware.com \
--to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox