public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	pgnet.trash@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.29-rc7 2/2] x86: disallow DAC for MCP51 PCI bridge
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:36:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AE83E6.4040608@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090304132945.2b242e63@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

Alan Cox wrote:
>> x86 is blacklisting DAC for everything VIA. :-)
> 
> I'd assume that comes from published docs given VIA actually publish
> stuff if you ask nicely.

Dunno the history but it's from the time before VIA begins publishing.
It's probably worthwhile to refine the blacklisting.

>> * MCP51 is a very old chipset at this point (it's circa 2005).  Not
>>   many machine would be running with >4GB memory to begin with.
>>
>> * Given the above and scarcity of DAC on most end user machines
>>   (nothing on MCP51 does DAC by default), lack of reports isn't too
>>   surprising.
>>
>> * The board doesn't have a 64bit connector.  It can't be dodgy
>>   connector and sil24 is known to behave well with DAC.  The failure
>>   being specific to the particular machine doesn't seem likely.
>>
>> I'll ping nvidia about it but I think your bar is too high.
> 
> I don't think wanting to see *two* examples is a high bar.

I don't think it's an easy combination.  Circa 2005 desktop machine
with >4GB ram + DAC capable controller running Linux with owner who
will report seemingly random data corruption which will end up in the
correct hands and given that non-working DAC isn't too surprising of
the machines of that time and isn't very likely caused by random
component or connection failure, I think we'll be better off just
blacklisting it.  That said, I admit I'm more trigger happy with
blacklists than some people (I think it's generally better to have
working systems than chasing performance on not-so-common cases).

Anyways, I pinged Peer Chen on the issue.  Let's see whether he can
confirm it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

      reply	other threads:[~2009-03-04 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-04  2:32 [PATCH 2.6.29-rc7 1/2] x86: fix iommu=nodac parameter handling Tejun Heo
2009-03-04  2:39 ` [PATCH 2.6.29-rc7 2/2] x86: disallow DAC for MCP51 PCI bridge Tejun Heo
2009-03-04  9:57   ` Alan Cox
2009-03-04 10:11     ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-04 13:29       ` Alan Cox
2009-03-04 13:36         ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49AE83E6.4040608@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pgnet.trash@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox