public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ipmi: reduce stack size of msghandler
@ 2009-03-04 12:22 Frank Seidel
  2009-03-04 14:59 ` Corey Minyard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Frank Seidel @ 2009-03-04 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux kernel
  Cc: akpm, minyard, openipmi-developer, Frank Seidel, Frank Seidel,
	kernalert.de, djwong, Adrian Bunk, Alexey Dobriyan, cminyard,
	kbaidarov, crquan

From: Frank Seidel <frank@f-seidel.de>

Reduce stack memory footprint in ipmi_msghandler
for send_panic_events. (From 992 bytes on i386
down to below 100)

Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <frank@f-seidel.de>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -4001,8 +4001,20 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
 	unsigned char                     data[16];
 	struct ipmi_system_interface_addr *si;
 	struct ipmi_addr                  addr;
-	struct ipmi_smi_msg               smi_msg;
-	struct ipmi_recv_msg              recv_msg;
+	struct ipmi_smi_msg               *smi_msg;
+	struct ipmi_recv_msg              *recv_msg;
+
+	smi_msg = kmalloc(sizeof(*smi_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
+	recv_msg = kmalloc(sizeof(*recv_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	if (!smi_msg || !recv_msg) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Could not allocate memory\n");
+		if (smi_msg)
+			kfree(smi_msg);
+		else if (recv_msg)
+			kfree(recv_msg);
+		return;
+	}
 
 	si = (struct ipmi_system_interface_addr *) &addr;
 	si->addr_type = IPMI_SYSTEM_INTERFACE_ADDR_TYPE;
@@ -4030,8 +4042,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
 		data[7] = str[2];
 	}
 
-	smi_msg.done = dummy_smi_done_handler;
-	recv_msg.done = dummy_recv_done_handler;
+	smi_msg->done = dummy_smi_done_handler;
+	recv_msg->done = dummy_recv_done_handler;
 
 	/* For every registered interface, send the event. */
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
@@ -4048,8 +4060,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
 			       0,
 			       &msg,
 			       intf,
-			       &smi_msg,
-			       &recv_msg,
+			       smi_msg,
+			       recv_msg,
 			       0,
 			       intf->channels[0].address,
 			       intf->channels[0].lun,
@@ -4107,8 +4119,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
 			       0,
 			       &msg,
 			       intf,
-			       &smi_msg,
-			       &recv_msg,
+			       smi_msg,
+			       recv_msg,
 			       0,
 			       intf->channels[0].address,
 			       intf->channels[0].lun,
@@ -4127,8 +4139,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
 				       0,
 				       &msg,
 				       intf,
-				       &smi_msg,
-				       &recv_msg,
+				       smi_msg,
+				       recv_msg,
 				       0,
 				       intf->channels[0].address,
 				       intf->channels[0].lun,
@@ -4195,8 +4207,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
 				       0,
 				       &msg,
 				       intf,
-				       &smi_msg,
-				       &recv_msg,
+				       smi_msg,
+				       recv_msg,
 				       0,
 				       intf->channels[0].address,
 				       intf->channels[0].lun,
@@ -4204,6 +4216,9 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
 		}
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_IPMI_PANIC_STRING */
+
+	kfree(smi_msg);
+	kfree(recv_msg);
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_IPMI_PANIC_EVENT */
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ipmi: reduce stack size of msghandler
  2009-03-04 12:22 [PATCH] ipmi: reduce stack size of msghandler Frank Seidel
@ 2009-03-04 14:59 ` Corey Minyard
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2009-03-04 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Frank Seidel
  Cc: linux kernel, akpm, openipmi-developer, kernalert.de, djwong,
	Adrian Bunk, Alexey Dobriyan, cminyard, kbaidarov, crquan

Frank Seidel wrote:
> From: Frank Seidel <frank@f-seidel.de>
>
> Reduce stack memory footprint in ipmi_msghandler
> for send_panic_events. (From 992 bytes on i386
> down to below 100)
>   
I'm not sure this is a good idea.  This only occurs in a panic
situation, so it may be best to not dynamically allocate memory.

However, 992 bytes is a big chunk of data to swallow on the stack, even
on a panic.  What may be best here is to use static data for this
operation, then use an atomic to control access to the static data.  I
believe an atomic is better than a lock because it avoids problems with
possible re-entrancy with another panic on the same CPU.

Thanks,

-corey

> Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <frank@f-seidel.de>
> ---
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> @@ -4001,8 +4001,20 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
>  	unsigned char                     data[16];
>  	struct ipmi_system_interface_addr *si;
>  	struct ipmi_addr                  addr;
> -	struct ipmi_smi_msg               smi_msg;
> -	struct ipmi_recv_msg              recv_msg;
> +	struct ipmi_smi_msg               *smi_msg;
> +	struct ipmi_recv_msg              *recv_msg;
> +
> +	smi_msg = kmalloc(sizeof(*smi_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	recv_msg = kmalloc(sizeof(*recv_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +	if (!smi_msg || !recv_msg) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Could not allocate memory\n");
> +		if (smi_msg)
> +			kfree(smi_msg);
> +		else if (recv_msg)
> +			kfree(recv_msg);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  
>  	si = (struct ipmi_system_interface_addr *) &addr;
>  	si->addr_type = IPMI_SYSTEM_INTERFACE_ADDR_TYPE;
> @@ -4030,8 +4042,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
>  		data[7] = str[2];
>  	}
>  
> -	smi_msg.done = dummy_smi_done_handler;
> -	recv_msg.done = dummy_recv_done_handler;
> +	smi_msg->done = dummy_smi_done_handler;
> +	recv_msg->done = dummy_recv_done_handler;
>  
>  	/* For every registered interface, send the event. */
>  	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
> @@ -4048,8 +4060,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
>  			       0,
>  			       &msg,
>  			       intf,
> -			       &smi_msg,
> -			       &recv_msg,
> +			       smi_msg,
> +			       recv_msg,
>  			       0,
>  			       intf->channels[0].address,
>  			       intf->channels[0].lun,
> @@ -4107,8 +4119,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
>  			       0,
>  			       &msg,
>  			       intf,
> -			       &smi_msg,
> -			       &recv_msg,
> +			       smi_msg,
> +			       recv_msg,
>  			       0,
>  			       intf->channels[0].address,
>  			       intf->channels[0].lun,
> @@ -4127,8 +4139,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
>  				       0,
>  				       &msg,
>  				       intf,
> -				       &smi_msg,
> -				       &recv_msg,
> +				       smi_msg,
> +				       recv_msg,
>  				       0,
>  				       intf->channels[0].address,
>  				       intf->channels[0].lun,
> @@ -4195,8 +4207,8 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
>  				       0,
>  				       &msg,
>  				       intf,
> -				       &smi_msg,
> -				       &recv_msg,
> +				       smi_msg,
> +				       recv_msg,
>  				       0,
>  				       intf->channels[0].address,
>  				       intf->channels[0].lun,
> @@ -4204,6 +4216,9 @@ static void send_panic_events(char *str)
>  		}
>  	}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_IPMI_PANIC_STRING */
> +
> +	kfree(smi_msg);
> +	kfree(recv_msg);
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_IPMI_PANIC_EVENT */
>  
>
>   


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-04 14:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-04 12:22 [PATCH] ipmi: reduce stack size of msghandler Frank Seidel
2009-03-04 14:59 ` Corey Minyard

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox