public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]" <jorge@dti2.net>
To: npiggin@suse.de
Cc: ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Error testing ext3 on brd ramdisk
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:19:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AF9932.2040301@dti2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090305065529.GB11916@wotan.suse.de>

Nick Piggin escribió:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:42:18PM +0100, Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] wrote:
>> Nick Piggin escribió:
>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 07:08:46PM +0100, Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] wrote:
>>>> 	Hi,
>>>>
>>>> 	I have added Nick Piggin to the CC: as maintainer of the brd driver.
>>>>
>>>> 	After switching an embedded distribution that /etc on a ramdisk 
>>>> 	based minix filesystem from 2.6.23.17 to 2.6.29-rcX i am too getting 
>>>> 	errors ant the filesystem is corrupted. Does not happen always. The 
>>>> visible effect with text files after reboot is getting the old version of 
>>>> the file and "\0"'s at the end.
>>>>
>>>> 	Did you found a solution?
>>> What architectures are you using? It's possible that brd is missing
>>> a cacheflush. I test it pretty heavily on x86 and no problems, so
>>> this might point to an arch specific problem.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/block/brd.c |    4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/block/brd.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/block/brd.c
>>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/block/brd.c
>>> @@ -275,8 +275,10 @@ static int brd_do_bvec(struct brd_device
>>> 	if (rw == READ) {
>>> 		copy_from_brd(mem + off, brd, sector, len);
>>> 		flush_dcache_page(page);
>>> -	} else
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		flush_dcache_page(page);
>>> 		copy_to_brd(brd, mem + off, sector, len);
>>> +	}
>>> 	kunmap_atomic(mem, KM_USER0);
>>>
>>> out:
>> 	Hi, I am on 32bits x86, 2 x Xeon with HT CPUs, but I have seen the 
>> 	same corruption on a KVM/QEMU guest with single emulated CPU.
>>
>> 	With your patch on top of vanilla 2.6.29-rc3+plus some networking 
>> patches I still get corruption sometimes.
>>
>> 	The script that saves the configuration does...
>>
>> ------------
>> mount -no remount,ro /dev/ram0
>> dd if=/dev/ram0 of=config.bin bs=1k count=1000
>> mount -no remount,rw /dev/ram0
>> md5sum config.bin
>> dd if=config.bin of=/dev/hda1
>> echo $md5sum | dd of=/dev/hda1 bs=1k seek=1100 count=32
>> ------------
>>
>> on system boot
>>
>> ------------
>> CHECK MD5SUM
>> dd if=/dev/hda1 of=/dev/ram0 bs=1k count=1000
>> fsck.minix -a /dev/ram0
>> mount -nt minix /dev/ram0 /etc -o rw
>> ------------
>>
>> 	I have never seen a MD5 failure on boot, just sometimes the 
>> 	filesystem is corrupted. Kernel config attached.
> 
> Hi Jorge,
> 
> Well I found and fixed something :) (see other mail) but I don't know
> whether that applies to you here if you're running with a single CPU
> and no preemption. But still, it might be worth trying that patch? I'm

	I first saw the corruption on the 2 x Xeon system. I'll try it and let 
you know.

> sorry I'm still unable to reproduce a problem with your script
> (although you don't describe how you create the filesystem before
> you remount it).

	If the MD5Sum check fails the startup script copy a templated image of 
the filesystem contained on a file on another partition to the ramdisk.

>>From your description, it suggests that the corrupted image is being
> read from /dev/ram0 (becuase the md5sum passes).

	No, it is read from /dev/hda1.

> In your script, can you run fsck.minix on config.bin when you first
> create it? What if you unmount /dev/ram0 before copying the image?

	Yesterday I did some tests and found that doing...

-----------
umount /etc (/etc is what is mounted from /dev/ram0)
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ram0 bs=1k count=1000
mount /dev/ram0 /etc -t minix -o rw
-----------
...succeds and mounts a corrupted filesystem with the old content. Doing 
the same with the all ramdisk driver fails on mount with "no filesystem 
found".

If I do...
-----------
umount /etc (/etc is what is mounted from /dev/ram0)
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ram0 bs=1k count=1000
mount /dev/ram0 /etc -t minix -o rw
----------
... then the mount fails with no filesystem found as it should.

	Does this ring any bell? :-)

	Regards,

	Jorge

-- 
==============================================================
Jorge Boncompte - Ingenieria y Gestion de RED
DTI2 - Desarrollo de la Tecnologia de las Comunicaciones
--------------------------------------------------------------
C/ Abogado Enriquez Barrios, 5   14004 CORDOBA (SPAIN)
Tlf: +34 957 761395 / FAX: +34 957 450380
==============================================================
- Sin pistachos no hay Rock & Roll...
- Without wicker a basket cannot be made.
==============================================================


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-05  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-14 13:25 Error testing ext3 on brd ramdisk Adrian Hunter
2009-02-27 18:08 ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
2009-02-28  5:58   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-02 17:42     ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
2009-03-05  6:55       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-05  9:19         ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2] [this message]
2009-03-05  9:46           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-05 10:56             ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
2009-03-05 12:12               ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
2009-03-10 16:12                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-10 16:30                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-10 16:49                     ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
2009-03-11  2:19                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 17:06                         ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
2009-03-17  9:40                           ` Denis Karpov
2009-03-18 12:11                             ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-18 13:42                               ` Jan Kara
2009-03-20 12:24                                 ` Denis Karpov
2009-03-20 12:49                                   ` Denis Karpov
2009-03-20 13:35                                 ` Denis Karpov
2009-03-05 10:45           ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-05 11:54             ` Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]
2009-03-06  7:47         ` Adrian Hunter
2009-03-10 11:03           ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49AF9932.2040301@dti2.net \
    --to=jorge@dti2.net \
    --cc=ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox