From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754309AbZCFCAa (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 21:00:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753747AbZCFCAU (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 21:00:20 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:44539 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752862AbZCFCAT (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 21:00:19 -0500 Message-ID: <49B083AC.1070505@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:00:12 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput CC: Ingo Molnar , x86 maintainers , LKML , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 References: <1236287654.3677.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090305212535.GA13848@elte.hu> <1236288780.3677.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1236288780.3677.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: >> >>> On latest tip I am getting: >>> >>> [ 124.169475] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 >>> [ 124.169508] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel >>> [ 146.582299] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 >>> [ 146.582299] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel >>> [ 836.653168] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 >>> [ 836.653201] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel >>> >>> But 1d10914bf2c8 was working fine. > > No it is also not fine :( for percpu. > >> That's a linker bug - Tejun Cc:-ed. >> > > Problem is basically with 64 bit percpu on 32 bit it is OK. Ahh, Here is > the solution: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/3/129 > > because of commit 8ac83757149 of Tejun Heo. Yeah, patchset almost ready. Please wait a bit more. Thanks. -- tejun