* [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
@ 2009-03-05 21:14 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-05 21:25 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-03-05 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, LKML
On latest tip I am getting:
[ 124.169475] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
[ 124.169508] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
[ 146.582299] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
[ 146.582299] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
[ 836.653168] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
[ 836.653201] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
But 1d10914bf2c8 was working fine.
Thanks,
--
JSR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
2009-03-05 21:14 [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-03-05 21:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-05 21:33 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-05 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput, Tejun Heo; +Cc: x86 maintainers, LKML
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> On latest tip I am getting:
>
> [ 124.169475] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> [ 124.169508] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> [ 146.582299] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> [ 146.582299] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> [ 836.653168] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> [ 836.653201] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
>
> But 1d10914bf2c8 was working fine.
That's a linker bug - Tejun Cc:-ed.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
2009-03-05 21:25 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-03-05 21:33 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-06 2:00 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput @ 2009-03-05 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Tejun Heo, x86 maintainers, LKML, Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On latest tip I am getting:
> >
> > [ 124.169475] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> > [ 124.169508] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> > [ 146.582299] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> > [ 146.582299] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> > [ 836.653168] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> > [ 836.653201] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> >
> > But 1d10914bf2c8 was working fine.
No it is also not fine :( for percpu.
>
> That's a linker bug - Tejun Cc:-ed.
>
Problem is basically with 64 bit percpu on 32 bit it is OK. Ahh, Here is
the solution:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/3/129
because of commit 8ac83757149 of Tejun Heo.
Thanks
--
JSR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
2009-03-05 21:33 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
@ 2009-03-06 2:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-06 11:18 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2009-03-06 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, x86 maintainers, LKML, Mike Galbraith
Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On latest tip I am getting:
>>>
>>> [ 124.169475] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
>>> [ 124.169508] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
>>> [ 146.582299] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
>>> [ 146.582299] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
>>> [ 836.653168] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
>>> [ 836.653201] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
>>>
>>> But 1d10914bf2c8 was working fine.
>
> No it is also not fine :( for percpu.
>
>> That's a linker bug - Tejun Cc:-ed.
>>
>
> Problem is basically with 64 bit percpu on 32 bit it is OK. Ahh, Here is
> the solution:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/3/129
>
> because of commit 8ac83757149 of Tejun Heo.
Yeah, patchset almost ready. Please wait a bit more.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
2009-03-06 2:00 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2009-03-06 11:18 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-03-06 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput, x86 maintainers, LKML, Mike Galbraith
* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 22:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On latest tip I am getting:
> >>>
> >>> [ 124.169475] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> >>> [ 124.169508] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> >>> [ 146.582299] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> >>> [ 146.582299] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> >>> [ 836.653168] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690
> >>> [ 836.653201] `msr_debug' likely not compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> >>>
> >>> But 1d10914bf2c8 was working fine.
> >
> > No it is also not fine :( for percpu.
> >
> >> That's a linker bug - Tejun Cc:-ed.
> >>
> >
> > Problem is basically with 64 bit percpu on 32 bit it is OK. Ahh, Here is
> > the solution:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/3/129
> >
> > because of commit 8ac83757149 of Tejun Heo.
>
> Yeah, patchset almost ready. Please wait a bit more.
>
> Thanks.
Latest tip:master should have your fixes for modules and kernel
text getting farther than ~2GB apart from each other on 64-bit.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-06 11:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-05 21:14 [x86-tip] overflow in relocation type 11 val 39ffdd0e8690 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-05 21:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-05 21:33 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-06 2:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-06 11:18 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox