From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754604AbZCFJCn (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2009 04:02:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751939AbZCFJC3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2009 04:02:29 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:61688 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010AbZCFJC2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2009 04:02:28 -0500 Message-ID: <49B0E6A9.9020702@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:02:33 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dobriyan CC: Andrew Morton , LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kmemdup_from_user(): introduce References: <49B0CAEC.80801@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090306082056.GB3450@x200.localdomain> <49B0DE89.9000401@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090306090313.GB4225@x200.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20090306090313.GB4225@x200.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Why not if we have good reasons? And I don't think we can call this >> "happen to" if there are 250+ of them? > > Please, read through them. This "250+" number suddenly will become > like 20, because wrapper is not good enough. > I did read most of them roughly, and it will be at least 50.