From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
roland@redhat.com, Greg Kurz <gkurz@fr.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:43:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B2CE6E.3090501@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090307190428.GA30594@us.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 814 bytes --]
Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>> Gregory Kurz proposed a solution:
>> * when shutdown is called and we are not in the init pidns, then we kill
>> the process 1 of the pidnamespace.
>> * when reboot is called and we are not in the init pidns, then we reexec
>> the init process, using the same command line. I guess this one could be
>> easily retrieved if we are able to display /proc/1/cmdline ;)
>>
>> IMHO, this is a good proposition because it is generic and intuitive, no ?
>>
>> What do you thing ?
>>
>
> Yes, I think it makes sense. Do we have any prototype patches that
> implement this behavior ?
>
I have a simple prototype for the first case, added in attachment.
For the second case, I didn't had time to do it yet as it is not so
trivial because we force an exec of another process.
[-- Attachment #2: kill-cinit-at-shutdown.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2785 bytes --]
Subject: kill the pid 1 process at shutdown
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
This patch makes the pid 1 to be killed when we shutdown the host
and we are not in the init namespace.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
---
include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 5 +++++
kernel/pid_namespace.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
kernel/sys.c | 17 +++++++++++------
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: 2.6.29-rc3/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
===================================================================
--- 2.6.29-rc3.orig/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
+++ 2.6.29-rc3/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static inline struct pid_namespace *get_
extern struct pid_namespace *copy_pid_ns(unsigned long flags, struct pid_namespace *ns);
extern void free_pid_ns(struct kref *kref);
+extern int power_off_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns);
extern void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns);
static inline void put_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns)
@@ -72,6 +73,10 @@ static inline void put_pid_ns(struct pid
{
}
+static inline int power_off_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
static inline void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *ns)
{
Index: 2.6.29-rc3/kernel/pid_namespace.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.29-rc3.orig/kernel/pid_namespace.c
+++ 2.6.29-rc3/kernel/pid_namespace.c
@@ -148,6 +148,23 @@ void free_pid_ns(struct kref *kref)
put_pid_ns(parent);
}
+int power_off_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ if (pid_ns == &init_pid_ns)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ task = pid_task(find_vpid(1), PIDTYPE_PID);
+ force_sig(SIGKILL, task);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
{
int nr;
Index: 2.6.29-rc3/kernel/sys.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.29-rc3.orig/kernel/sys.c
+++ 2.6.29-rc3/kernel/sys.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <linux/seccomp.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
@@ -393,15 +394,19 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(reboot, int, magic1, int
break;
case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_HALT:
- kernel_halt();
- unlock_kernel();
- do_exit(0);
+ if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
+ kernel_halt();
+ unlock_kernel();
+ do_exit(0);
+ }
break;
case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_POWER_OFF:
- kernel_power_off();
- unlock_kernel();
- do_exit(0);
+ if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
+ kernel_power_off();
+ unlock_kernel();
+ do_exit(0);
+ }
break;
case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART2:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-07 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-19 3:02 [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 3:05 ` [PATCH 1/7][v8] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 3:05 ` [PATCH 2/7][v8] Protect init from unwanted signals more Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 3:06 ` [PATCH 3/7][v8] Add from_ancestor_ns parameter to send_signal() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 3:06 ` [PATCH 4/7][v8] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 3:07 ` [PATCH 5/7][v8] zap_pid_ns_process() should use force_sig() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-19 20:26 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 3:07 ` [PATCH 6/7][v8] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 3:07 ` [PATCH 7/7][v8] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 16:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 18:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-19 22:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 22:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-19 23:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 23:51 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-20 0:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20 1:06 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-20 2:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20 3:10 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-20 4:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20 0:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-20 1:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 14:59 ` [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics Daniel Lezcano
2009-03-07 19:04 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-07 19:43 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2009-03-07 19:51 ` Greg Kurz
2009-03-07 19:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2009-02-19 20:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49B2CE6E.3090501@free.fr \
--to=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gkurz@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox