From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753452AbZCKAVO (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:21:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751162AbZCKAU6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:20:58 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:40327 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750991AbZCKAU6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:20:58 -0400 Message-ID: <49B703D4.1000008@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:20:36 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List CC: the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: x86: removing zImage support? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm thinking again about removing zImage support. An "allnoconfig" kernel (with CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y to expose additional knobs, and CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y so it can do anything at all) is currently 487K on i386 -- very close to the upper limit of 512K for zImage. Are there *any* residual users of this, or should I just push a patch to remove it once and for all? -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.