From: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] (latest tip) make dequeue_task less confusing
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:26:11 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B8CE2B.8070402@davidnewall.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 319 bytes --]
The dequeue_patch function in kernel/sched.c is complicated by
including a sleep parameter. This parameter is always zero
except in one instance. This patch clarifies the task of
dequeue_patch by removing the sleep parameter and moving the
code that handles non-zero sleep to that one place where it is
needed.
[-- Attachment #2: sched.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1782 bytes --]
--- kernel/sched.c 2009-03-12 18:41:41.000000000 +1030
+++ kernel/sched.c.dn 2009-03-12 18:45:18.000000000 +1030
@@ -1791,21 +1791,10 @@
p->se.on_rq = 1;
}
-static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
+static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (sleep) {
- if (p->se.last_wakeup) {
- update_avg(&p->se.avg_overlap,
- p->se.sum_exec_runtime - p->se.last_wakeup);
- p->se.last_wakeup = 0;
- } else {
- update_avg(&p->se.avg_wakeup,
- sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity);
- }
- }
-
sched_info_dequeued(p);
- p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
+ p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
p->se.on_rq = 0;
}
@@ -1875,7 +1864,22 @@
if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
- dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
+ if (sleep) {
+ if (p->se.last_wakeup) {
+ update_avg(&p->se.avg_overlap,
+ p->se.sum_exec_runtime - p->se.last_wakeup);
+ p->se.last_wakeup = 0;
+ } else {
+ update_avg(&p->se.avg_wakeup,
+ sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);*/
+ sched_info_dequeued(p);
+ p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
+ p->se.on_rq = 0;
+
dec_nr_running(rq);
}
@@ -5323,7 +5327,7 @@
on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (on_rq)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p);
if (running)
p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p);
@@ -5372,7 +5376,7 @@
}
on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
if (on_rq)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p);
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
set_load_weight(p);
@@ -9189,7 +9193,7 @@
on_rq = tsk->se.on_rq;
if (on_rq)
- dequeue_task(rq, tsk, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, tsk);
if (unlikely(running))
tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-12 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-12 8:56 David Newall [this message]
2009-03-12 9:55 ` [PATCH] (latest tip) make dequeue_task less confusing Ingo Molnar
2009-03-12 13:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-12 18:02 ` David Newall
2009-03-13 0:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 3:58 ` David Newall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49B8CE2B.8070402@davidnewall.com \
--to=davidn@davidnewall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox