From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86: make e820_update_range() handle small range update
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:20:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49BC9E14.4000005@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090315060456.GF20949@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Commit-ID: 78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
>>>>>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/78a8b35bc7abf8b8333d6f625e08c0f7cc1c3742
>>>>>> Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>>>>>> AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:36:01 -0700
>>>>>> Commit: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>>>>>> CommitDate: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:20:07 +0100
>>>>>>
>>>>>> x86: make e820_update_range() handle small range update
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Impact: enhance e820 code to handle more cases
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try to handle new range which could be covered by one entry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>>>>>> Cc: jbeulich@novell.com
>>>>>> LKML-Reference: <49B9F0C1.10402@kernel.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>>>>> -tip testing found a bootup crash + reboot due to this patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> config attached. The bootup crashes here:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 0.000000] MTRR variable ranges enabled:
>>>>> [ 0.000000] 0 base 0000000000 mask FFC0000000 write-back
>>>>> [ 0.000000] 1 disabled
>>>>> [ 0.000000] 2 disabled
>>>>> [ 0.000000] 3 disabled
>>>>> [ 0.000000] 4 disabled
>>>>> [ 0.000000] 5 disabled
>>>>> [ 0.000000] 6 disabled
>>>>> [ 0.000000] 7 disabled
>>>>> [ 0.000000] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
>>>>> [ 0.000000] get_mtrr: cpu0 reg00 base=0000000000 size=0000040000 write-back
>>>>> [ reboot ]
>>>>>
>>>> what does the e820 map look like?
>>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
>>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009f800 (usable)
>>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 000000000009f800 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
>>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
>>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000003fff0000 (usable)
>>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 000000003fff0000 - 000000003fff3000 (ACPI NVS)
>>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 000000003fff3000 - 0000000040000000 (ACPI data)
>>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000e0000000 - 00000000f0000000 (reserved)
>>> [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
>>>
>> it seems that patch revealed the bug in
>> setup_bios_corruption_check
>
> Cool. I'm wondering, could this explain:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12645
>
i wonder if we need to add print out about range from e820_update_range()
or add sth like boundary checking in e820_update_range() to stop crazy calling?
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-15 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-12 12:57 [PATCH] x86: clean up output resulting from update_mptable option Jan Beulich
2009-03-13 2:34 ` [tip:x86/mm] " Jan Beulich
2009-03-13 4:35 ` [PATCH] x86: fix e820_update_range() Yinghai Lu
2009-03-13 4:39 ` [tip:x86/mm] " Yinghai Lu
2009-03-13 5:36 ` [PATCH] x86: make e820_update_range to handle small range update Yinghai Lu
2009-03-14 11:39 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: make e820_update_range() " Yinghai Lu
2009-03-14 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-14 18:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-14 18:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-14 21:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-15 6:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 6:20 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2009-03-15 6:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 6:12 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86: fix 64k corruption-check Yinghai Lu
2009-03-13 7:57 ` [PATCH] x86: fix e820_update_range() Jan Beulich
2009-03-13 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 18:22 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49BC9E14.4000005@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox