From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755639AbZCQT7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:59:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753317AbZCQT7l (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:59:41 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:43759 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753310AbZCQT7l (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:59:41 -0400 Message-ID: <49C0012A.6060903@goop.org> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:59:38 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [crash] Re: Latest brk patchset References: <49BC413B.5020104@zytor.com> <49BC4CAC.202@goop.org> <49BC4DB6.9070403@zytor.com> <49BCA03D.3020605@goop.org> <20090315203802.GA14625@elte.hu> <49BD70EF.7010204@goop.org> <20090315212854.GA23960@elte.hu> <49BD8F15.4020301@goop.org> <20090316085402.GC1062@elte.hu> <49BE7A84.2030503@goop.org> <49BE84D6.3010006@kernel.org> <49BE9248.6050707@goop.org> <49BE97D5.4010002@zytor.com> <49BEA7BE.6050400@goop.org> <49BEAD27.3050801@kernel.org> <49BEAFEC.7020400@goop.org> <49BEB5FE.7050601@zytor.com> <49BEBD98.3090905@goop.org> <49BEC143.6030104@zytor.com> <49BEC53F.20200@goop.org> <49BED431.5070201@zytor.com> <49BF0A51.5000909@kernel.org> <49BF2054.9020009@zytor.com> <49BF301C.6010708@goop.org> <49BFCA05.7000508@zytor.com> <49BFFD3C.3020908@goop.org> <49BFFDE4.1070601@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <49BFFDE4.1070601@zytor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> >> Here's an updated patch: >> > > I already pushed an update (and you should have gotten notification > email)... Mail went to Citrix, which I don't check as regularly. > can you verify that it matches what the end result should be in your > opinion? Yep, looks good. I've rebased the other two changes: The following changes since commit 60ac98213914cc615c67e84bfb964aa95a080d13: H. Peter Anvin (1): x86-32: tighten the bound on additional memory to map are available in the git repository at: ssh://master.kernel.org/~jeremy/git/xen.git tip/x86/setup-memory Jeremy Fitzhardinge (2): x86/brk: make the brk reservation symbols inaccessible from C x86/brk: put the brk reservations in their own section arch/x86/include/asm/setup.h | 10 +++++----- arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_32.lds.S | 8 +++++--- arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)