public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next - request_module_nowait() breaks iptables and iwl3945
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:59:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C07F96.2070306@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903181442.16570.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 March 2009 08:57:15 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:27:58 +1030, Rusty Russell said:
>>> On Monday 16 March 2009 12:28:04 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>>>> On recent linux-next, iptables and iwl3945 would fail to load
>>> Please send .config; I can't reproduce this here.
>> [root@turing-police ~]# /etc/init.d/iptables start
>> iptables: Applying firewall rules: 
>> iptables-restore v1.4.2: iptables-restore: unable to initialize table 'filter'
> 
> OK, I think this might fix it.  It's already queued, but was labelled a mere
> "cleanup".

I wouldn't understand how it would fix it though;
the code before my patch passes in a 1, and the code after my patch passes in a variable
which has the value 1 as well.... using a symbolic name for it instead isn't going
to impact the generated code afaics...

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-18  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-16  1:58 linux-next - request_module_nowait() breaks iptables and iwl3945 Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-03-16 15:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-17  5:57 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-17 22:27   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-03-18  4:12     ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-18  4:59       ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-03-18 23:39         ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49C07F96.2070306@linux.intel.com \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox