From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758854AbZCSQzd (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:55:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753695AbZCSQzU (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:55:20 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:55786 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752271AbZCSQzT (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:55:19 -0400 Message-ID: <49C278F2.1000600@goop.org> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:55:14 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , Steven Rostedt , LKML , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: remove cpumask allocation from idle_balance References: <200903191522.21045.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200903192310.52314.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20090319132426.GA27017@elte.hu> <20090319162942.GA21672@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090319162942.GA21672@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > >>> This time for sure, >>> >> not so sure: >> >> [ 4.303068] ============================================================================= >> [ 4.303332] BUG idr_layer_cache: Redzone overwritten >> [ 4.303332] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> [ 4.303332] >> [ 4.303332] INFO: 0xffff88003f838958-0xffff88003f83895f. First byte 0xa1 instead of 0xbb >> [ 4.303332] INFO: Allocated in 0xffff88003f9b94b0 age=4294878587 cpu=2 pid=0 >> [ 4.303332] INFO: Freed in 0xffff88003f8389f0 age=18446744073709463001 cpu=4294967295 pid=0 >> [ 4.303332] INFO: Slab 0xffffe200015d5340 objects=13 used=10 fp=0xffff88003f838738 flags=0x40000000000020c3 >> [ 4.303332] INFO: Object 0xffff88003f838738 @offset=1848 fp=0x(null) >> > > hm, i'm seeing this even with the cpus4096 bits removed. > > It _seems_ to trigger when i add these two commits: > > 71ff49d: x86: with the last user gone, remove set_pte_present > b40c757: x86/32: no need to use set_pte_present in set_pte_vaddr > > but i'm not completely sure it's related, i tried a bisection and it > showed heisenbug properties. > > Might have come from upstream, that saw some IDR changes recently. > Seems very unlikely; those patches only touch 32-bit only code, and this looks like a 64-bit crash. J