From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760992AbZCSUPv (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:15:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759589AbZCSUPV (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:15:21 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:57422 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760469AbZCSUPU (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:15:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=odGnfpFTVgocJkibmvP0TlUTXIRkJNlCTVKTESFsqY15gILH4fKiAWiseJOYZ0QML9 yxKeaPtAG54Xwb3jikdqbdigtruki2jUT12seZkSKvASi2Fv22wk9e2m/mCoXMfykPBb 3Bs2c47EIYuw1MgDvVhor2aWDbinFmkJTodOg= Message-ID: <49C2A7D2.3020306@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:15:14 -0700 From: Corbin Simpson User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie CC: Sindhudweep Sarkar , David Airlie , Greg KH , Thomas Hellstrom , dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core changes References: <20090319040809.GA29249@kroah.com> <6c046ab30903190903r298a0334n939e64403b8aeda6@mail.gmail.com> <1237482776.5359.89.camel@dax.rpnet.com> In-Reply-To: <1237482776.5359.89.camel@dax.rpnet.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 12:03 -0400, Sindhudweep Sarkar wrote: >> This might be the opinion of a completely non educated end user but it >> seems that an intel specific drm and other bits (xorg, mesa) would be >> somewhat of a maintenance waste. >> >> TI-OMAP 3xxx and a couple of other arm processors use similar SGX-5xx >> graphics cores. IIRC arm is often little endian so perhaps a unified >> driver would be easier in the long term. > > Long term a unified driver would be very nice to have and nobody > disagrees with that. Things don't happen overnight and you have to take > smaller steps to get there. This proposal is one step on a road that may > lead to a driver for the TI part too. It will need someone in the ARM > community to step up and write the ARM specific bits. Nokia's written and open-sourced some related code for DRM. My university is paying me to work on an ARM-based SoC handheld with an SGX core, and I might be more into this later. (Y'know, once the device is actually out the door.) ~ C.