Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core changes

["Thomas Hellström" <thomas@shipmail.org>]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:14:35AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>   
>>> First off, the non-staging patches need more complete changelog entries,
>>> a bit of meaning goes a long way. I'll ack them if they are documented and
>>> make sense. The unlocked ioctl hook makes sense to me at least!
>>>   
>>>       
>> For the non-staging patches, (which also sit in the modesetting-newttm 
>> tree), I can add some more elaborate comments. However I think all of
>> them are targeted to support functionality for TTM, so unless the TTM
>> code goes into staging or mainstream, there is little point in merging
>> them to core drm before other drivers find them useful.
>>
>> Although I see the patch adding TTM is including some backwards
>> compatibility defines (In particular the PAT compat stuff) that needs
>> to be stripped.
>>     
>
> Great, care to respin it and send it to me?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>   
Greg,
A clean TTM patch was sent to Intel with the other patches.
I'm not sure why it got lost along the way?

/Thomas