From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757574AbZCXO24 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:28:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755740AbZCXO2o (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:28:44 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:40410 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752414AbZCXO2n (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:28:43 -0400 Message-ID: <49C8EE38.3030701@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:29:12 +0100 From: Hans de Goede User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090303 Fedora/3.0-1.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Delvare CC: Luca Tettamanti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Len Brown , Thomas Renninger , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources References: <498953DF.5050306@redhat.com> <20090204131708.GA2739@srcf.ucam.org> <20090204142606.1823661b@hyperion.delvare> <20090204142015.GB3923@srcf.ucam.org> <20090210145716.105ab58b@hyperion.delvare> <20090210140829.GA25397@srcf.ucam.org> <49919E08.5050002@redhat.com> <20090210172408.400cacee@hyperion.delvare> <20090227132740.GF1482@ucw.cz> <68676e00903240539i119b6d26j516ee131d4cd6781@mail.gmail.com> <49C8DE51.2010103@redhat.com> <20090324144315.196273ed@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20090324144315.196273ed@hyperion.delvare> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/24/2009 02:43 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Hans, Luca, > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:21:21 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On 03/24/2009 01:39 PM, Luca Tettamanti wrote: >>> the merge window for .30 is now open, what are we going to do with this issue? >> I think the consensus was to make the default strict and to merge the atk0110 >> driver, right? > > Yes. > >> Note that we've been running this setup in Fedora kernels for quite a while now, >> and have had only one bug report, which was solved by simply explaining why this >> was done. > > Maybe the explanation in question could be added somewhere, either in > the help text of CONFIG_HWMON, or somewhere under Documentation/, or on > the lm-sensors.org wiki? I think having an explanation somewhere would be great, not sure if the explanation in question was all that great though (and it is burried in between a gazillion other kernel bugs, so a bit hard to find). Regards, Hans