From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755409AbZCXXOv (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:14:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753967AbZCXXOk (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:14:40 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:46325 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753684AbZCXXOj (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:14:39 -0400 Message-ID: <49C96728.8070808@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:05:12 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , the arch/x86 maintainers , Xen-devel , Andrew Morton , Dave Airlie Subject: Re: 2.6.30 Xen merge plan (what's in xen.git) References: <49C915A3.3020809@goop.org> <20090324174859.GB31117@elte.hu> <49C921A8.3090200@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <49C921A8.3090200@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> >> hpa wanted dom0 changes in some cleaner fashion - he knows the >> details. (he'll be back in a few days) > > When I spoke to him last week about this he said he was OK with it. He > didn't make any specific (or even general) objections. Do you know > which subsystem he was referring to? > I was mostly objecting to the apic patches -- I'm okay with the latest version, as long as they aren't in hot code (I never got the time to measure it.) Other than that: the x86-touching bits seemed okay, the pure xen code... well, it's not my problem. I'll be back on Saturday. -hpa