From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755662AbZCXXhl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:37:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755193AbZCXXha (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:37:30 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:54120 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755300AbZCXXh3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:37:29 -0400 Message-ID: <49C96C92.1080604@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:28:18 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , the arch/x86 maintainers , Xen-devel , Andrew Morton , Dave Airlie Subject: Re: 2.6.30 Xen merge plan (what's in xen.git) References: <49C915A3.3020809@goop.org> <20090324174859.GB31117@elte.hu> <49C921A8.3090200@goop.org> <49C96728.8070808@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <49C96728.8070808@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > I was mostly objecting to the apic patches -- I'm okay with the latest > version, as long as they aren't in hot code (I never got the time to > measure it.) > Talking about performance measurements... do you have mmap-perf numbers (paravirt on native vs non-paravirt) for the latest -tip kernel? I've lost track of the numbers after all the changes. -hpa