From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity?
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:03:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C982E6.9010005@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903251129.19490.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:03:08 Rusty Russell wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 23:09:37 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> cpu_mask_to_apic_id do not take cpu_online_map into account and should
>>> probably be fixed. flat_cpu_mask_to_apicid was the one I could find.
>> Also the numaq apic.h. I'll do an audit and send a patch.
>
> Actually, numaq is just weird, so I'll assume it's correct. I couldn't
> find any others.
>
>> Yes, agree with Yinghai's fix. I'll re-spin my patch on top of his.
>
> But he already did it while I slept in.
>
waiting for ingo to put that three into tip/master:
[PATCH 1/3] x86: fix set_extra_move_desc calling
[PATCH 2/3] x86: use default_cpu_mask_to_apicid for 64bit
[PATCH 3/3] x86: Correct behaviour of irq affinity -v2
YH
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-24 5:49 [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity? Rusty Russell
2009-03-24 7:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 12:52 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-24 20:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 12:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-03-24 19:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 20:23 ` [PATCH] x86: fix set_extra_move_desc calling Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:15 ` [tip:x86/apic] " Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: use default_cpu_mask_to_apicid for 64bit Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] " Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-24 21:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: Correct behaviour of irq affinity -v2 Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: Correct behaviour of irq affinity Yinghai Lu
2009-03-24 21:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] " Rusty Russell
2009-03-25 17:51 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-25 0:33 ` [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity? Rusty Russell
2009-03-25 0:59 ` Rusty Russell
2009-03-25 1:03 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C982E6.9010005@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox