From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756212AbZCYBEW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:04:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753842AbZCYBEN (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:04:13 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:39886 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753802AbZCYBEN (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:04:13 -0400 Message-ID: <49C982E6.9010005@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:03:34 -0700 From: Yinghai Lu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: "Eric W. Biederman" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC] Correct behaviour of irq affinity? References: <200903241619.03517.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200903251103.10249.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200903251129.19490.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200903251129.19490.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wednesday 25 March 2009 11:03:08 Rusty Russell wrote: >> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 23:09:37 Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> cpu_mask_to_apic_id do not take cpu_online_map into account and should >>> probably be fixed. flat_cpu_mask_to_apicid was the one I could find. >> Also the numaq apic.h. I'll do an audit and send a patch. > > Actually, numaq is just weird, so I'll assume it's correct. I couldn't > find any others. > >> Yes, agree with Yinghai's fix. I'll re-spin my patch on top of his. > > But he already did it while I slept in. > waiting for ingo to put that three into tip/master: [PATCH 1/3] x86: fix set_extra_move_desc calling [PATCH 2/3] x86: use default_cpu_mask_to_apicid for 64bit [PATCH 3/3] x86: Correct behaviour of irq affinity -v2 YH