From: "José María Fernández González" <josemariafg@gmail.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: Some microSD cards are not recognized by PCIxx12 SDA controller
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:00:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C9E4B8.3000708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090324211748.30cd7429@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 02:21:21 +0100
>> diff -Nrpu linux-2.6.28.5/drivers/mmc/core/core.c.orig linux-2.6.28.5/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> --- linux-2.6.28.5/drivers/mmc/core/core.c.orig 2009-03-10 01:30:19.000000000 +0100
>> +++ linux-2.6.28.5/drivers/mmc/core/core.c 2009-03-10 01:29:44.000000000 +0100
>> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host
>> * This delay should be sufficient to allow the power supply
>> * to reach the minimum voltage.
>> */
>> - mmc_delay(2);
>> + mmc_delay(10);
>>
>
> A delay of 10 is just enough to trigger a sleep on most kernels
> (HZ=100). Have you determined the lower bound of these two values?
>
Well, I have been using the patch in a kernel with HZ=300, tickless (CONFIG_NO_HZ) and desktop preemption (CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY), but I didn't determine the lower bound. As I explained in the patch at -mm tree, I took as base the patch:
http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2007-December/002089.html
and I only extrapolated the need for a higher delay just after MMC_POWER_UP to this one and after MMC_POWER_ON. When I was looking for a fix for the problem I was suffering with my microSD card and laptop, I remember I found some e-mails from two years ago pointing out to some change in the scheduler which uncovered the problem.
As I'm going to install 2.6.29 today, I can test the patch with it and HZ=100.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-10 1:21 [PATCH 1/1] mmc: Some microSD cards are not recognized by PCIxx12 SDA controller José María Fernández González
2009-03-24 20:17 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-03-25 8:00 ` José María Fernández González [this message]
2009-03-25 16:17 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-03-26 16:37 ` José María Fernández González
2009-04-05 18:33 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-04-06 23:30 ` José María Fernández González
2009-04-10 21:35 ` Pierre Ossman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C9E4B8.3000708@gmail.com \
--to=josemariafg@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox