public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* feature-removal-schedule.txt updated ??
@ 2009-03-04 23:41 Xose Vazquez Perez
  2009-03-29  0:57 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xose Vazquez Perez @ 2009-03-04 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

hi,

code is still there or file is not updated ?


$ grep ^When  Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | egrep -v "2009|2010|2.6.3[0-9]"
When:   2.6.29
When:   July 2007
When:   December 2008
When:   November 2005
When:   August 2006
When:   before 2.6.19
When:   October 2008
When:   July 2008
When:   August 2007
When:   February 2008
When: Dec 2008
When:   July 2008
When:   2.6.27
When:   2.6.29
When:   After the only user (hal) has seen a release with the patches
When: 2.6.29

-thanks-

regards,
-- 
Polycommander, Erkowit, Urquiola, Andros Patria, Cason, Aegean Sea, Prestige, ...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: feature-removal-schedule.txt updated ??
  2009-03-04 23:41 feature-removal-schedule.txt updated ?? Xose Vazquez Perez
@ 2009-03-29  0:57 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
  2009-03-29  2:03   ` Jan Engelhardt
  2009-03-29  8:31   ` Jean Delvare
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xose Vazquez Perez @ 2009-03-29  0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: linux-kernel, pavel, mchehab, linux, hch, arjan, kay.sievers,
	rui.zhang, len.brown, htejun, jengelh, Michael Buesch, gcosta,
	jirislaby, rene.herman, ole, khali, tglx

Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

> code is still there or file is not updated ?
> 
> 
> $ grep ^When  Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | egrep -v "2009|2010|2.6.3[0-9]"
> When:   2.6.29
> When:   July 2007
> When:   December 2008
> When:   November 2005
> When:   August 2006
> When:   before 2.6.19
> When:   October 2008
> When:   July 2008
> When:   August 2007
> When:   February 2008
> When: Dec 2008
> When:   July 2008
> When:   2.6.27
> When:   2.6.29
> When:   After the only user (hal) has seen a release with the patches
> When: 2.6.29

today only ONE was fixed!!


-thanks-


regards,
-- 
Polycommander, Erkowit, Urquiola, Andros Patria, Cason, Aegean Sea, Prestige, ...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: feature-removal-schedule.txt updated ??
  2009-03-29  0:57 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
@ 2009-03-29  2:03   ` Jan Engelhardt
  2009-03-29  8:31   ` Jean Delvare
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2009-03-29  2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xose Vazquez Perez
  Cc: linux-kernel, pavel, mchehab, linux, hch, arjan, kay.sievers,
	rui.zhang, len.brown, htejun, Michael Buesch, gcosta, jirislaby,
	rene.herman, ole, khali, tglx


On Sunday 2009-03-29 01:57, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:

>Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>
>> code is still there or file is not updated ?
>> 
>> 
>> $ grep ^When  Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | egrep -v "2009|2010|2.6.3[0-9]"
>> When:   2.6.29
>> When:   July 2007
>>[...]

I tried (even more so since I added entries to feature-removal),
and, well, read for yourself.

http://marc.info/?l=netfilter-devel&m=123173478332330&w=2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: feature-removal-schedule.txt updated ??
  2009-03-29  0:57 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
  2009-03-29  2:03   ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2009-03-29  8:31   ` Jean Delvare
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2009-03-29  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xose Vazquez Perez
  Cc: linux-kernel, pavel, mchehab, linux, hch, arjan, kay.sievers,
	rui.zhang, len.brown, htejun, jengelh, Michael Buesch, gcosta,
	jirislaby, rene.herman, ole, tglx

Hi Xose,

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:57:58 +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> 
> > code is still there or file is not updated ?
> > 
> > $ grep ^When  Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | egrep -v "2009|2010|2.6.3[0-9]"
> > When:   2.6.29
> > When:   July 2007
> > When:   December 2008
> > When:   November 2005
> > When:   August 2006
> > When:   before 2.6.19
> > When:   October 2008
> > When:   July 2008
> > When:   August 2007
> > When:   February 2008
> > When: Dec 2008
> > When:   July 2008
> > When:   2.6.27
> > When:   2.6.29
> > When:   After the only user (hal) has seen a release with the patches
> > When: 2.6.29
> 
> today only ONE was fixed!!

This is all not very constructive. For one thing the merge window is
still open, so there are reasonable chances that more entries will be
removed in the next 9 days.

For another, flooding people that way isn't going to fix anything. If
you really want the situation to improve, you have to look at offending
entries individually, contact the responsible person individually, ask
why the entry is still there, and then send a patch removing or
updating it if needs be. This is constructive. Yelling "there are
out-of-date entries in Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt" is
not.

In other words, if you are sufficiently bothered by the current
situation and want it to change, then work on it yourself, on your own
time. We aren't your slaves, and we don't owe you anything.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-29  8:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-04 23:41 feature-removal-schedule.txt updated ?? Xose Vazquez Perez
2009-03-29  0:57 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2009-03-29  2:03   ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-29  8:31   ` Jean Delvare

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox