public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, bharrosh@panasas.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] block: fix SG_IO vector request data length	handling
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:27:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D35D9F.3000204@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090401211851Y.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:50:58 +0200
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Apr 01 2009, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>> On Wed,  1 Apr 2009 20:04:38 +0900
>>> Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Impact: fix SG_IO behavior such that it matches the documentation
>>>>
>>>> SG_IO howto says that if ->dxfer_len and sum of iovec disagress, the
>>>> shorter one wins.  However, the current implementation returns -EINVAL
>>>> for such cases.  Trim iovc if it's longer than ->dxfer_len.
>>> Is that description about sg's SG_IO?

It looks like it's the closest thing.

>> The more important question is what sg.c actually does, that's more
>> important than the documentation.

The current code would fail it with -EINVAL but after brief look into
2.6.12-rc2, it seems like it would use the shorter one.  On direct
mapping path, it builds considering both lengths and on indirect path
it doesn't seem to look at the iov supplied till the transfer is
actually complete using the dxfer_len and then copy out whatever can
be copied out.

> Do you think that Doug is a person who makes such mistake? ;)
> 
> Seems that sg worked as the howto says. But I think that I broke it
> when I converted sg to use the block layer. I'll fix it soon.
> 
> About this patch, as we know, there are lots of subtle differences
> between sg's SG_IO and the block's. I'm not sure that it's a good idea
> to change the behavior of the block's SG_IO.

I think it's better to make the behavior more consistent.  Using
shorter dxfer_len can be considered a feature too, so...

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-01 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-01 11:04 [GIT PATCHSET block#for-linus] block: blk-map related fixes Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 1/8] scatterlist: make sure sg_miter_next() doesn't return 0 sized mappings Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 2/8] block: fix SG_IO vector request data length handling Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:47   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 11:50     ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 12:18       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 12:24         ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 12:27         ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-04-01 12:29           ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 3/8] block: fix queue bounce limit setting Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 4/8] bio: actually inline inline bvecs into bio Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 12:47   ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 12:55     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 12:59       ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 5/8] bio: fix bio_kmalloc() Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 6/8] bio: remove size/segments limit on bio_{copy|map}_{user|kern}*() Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-map: let blk_rq_map_user_iov() support null mapping Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:54   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 12:03     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-map: reimplement blk_rq_map_user() using blk_rq_map_user_iov() Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 12:44   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 12:50     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 12:59       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 13:03         ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 13:10           ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 13:17             ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 13:18               ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 13:22               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-01 13:28                 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49D35D9F.3000204@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox