From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756904AbZDBFUF (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:20:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751526AbZDBFTt (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:19:49 -0400 Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:43671 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002AbZDBFTs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:19:48 -0400 Message-ID: <49D44AD7.8010305@cosmosbay.com> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:19:19 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: Ingo Molnar , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Tejun Heo , linux kernel , Linux Netdev List , Joe Perches Subject: Re: [RFC] percpu: convert SNMP mibs to new infra References: <49D32212.80607@cosmosbay.com> <49D3A0C2.9000403@cosmosbay.com> <49D3B61F.8010507@cosmosbay.com> <200904021534.34084.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200904021534.34084.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (gw1.cosmosbay.com [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:19:21 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell a écrit : > On Thursday 02 April 2009 05:14:47 Eric Dumazet wrote: >> Here is a preliminary patch for SNMP mibs that seems to work well on x86_32 >> >> [RFC] percpu: convert SNMP mibs to new infra > > OK, I have a whole heap of "convert to dynamic per-cpu" patches waiting in > the wings too, once Tejun's conversion is complete. > > Also, what is optimal depends on the arch: we had a long discussion on this > (it's what local_t was supposed to do, with cpu_local_inc() etc: see > Subject: local_add_return 2008-12-16 thread). > > eg. on S/390, atomic_inc is a win over the two-counter version. On Sparc, > two-counter wins. On x86, inc wins (obviously). > > But efforts to create a single primitive have been problematic: maybe > open-coding it like this is the Right Thing. > I tried to find a generic CONFIG_ define that would annonce that an arche has a fast percpu_add() implementation. (faster than __raw_get_cpu_var, for example, when we already are in a preempt disabled section) Any idea ? For example, net/ipv4/route.c has : static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rt_cache_stat, rt_cache_stat); #define RT_CACHE_STAT_INC(field) \ (__raw_get_cpu_var(rt_cache_stat).field++) We could use percpu_add(rt_cache_stat.field, 1) instead, only if percpu_add() is not the generic one. #define __percpu_generic_to_op(var, val, op) \ do { \ get_cpu_var(var) op val; \ put_cpu_var(var); \ } while (0) #ifndef percpu_add # define percpu_add(var, val) __percpu_generic_to_op(var, (val), +=) #endif