From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935475AbZDBJg4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 05:36:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763875AbZDBJgo (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 05:36:44 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:35661 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761566AbZDBJgn (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 05:36:43 -0400 Message-ID: <49D48726.6040106@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:36:38 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux IDE mailing list CC: Jens Axboe , LKML Subject: Re: IDE, packet commands and REQ_TYPE_SENSE? References: <49D48600.2070109@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <49D48600.2070109@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Can we get rid of REQ_TYPE_SENSE? Strike that, I forgot about blk_sense_request()