From: "Steven A. Falco" <sfalco@harris.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hjk@linutronix.de,
"Herrera-Bendezu, Luis" <lherrera@harris.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: UIO: uio_mem does not handle devices above 4 GB address
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:20:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D4BB9F.8050903@harris.com> (raw)
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 01:20:49PM -0400, Herrera-Bendezu, Luis wrote:
> >> I am working on a PPC440EPx board with some FPGAs located at
> >> addresses above 4 GB
Cc'ing the PPC list, since they have the most experience with this
CPU, and may have some useful insights. The topic is "UIO on the
PPC440EPx - 36-bit physical addresses".
The PPC440EPx uses 36-bit addressing but is a 32-bit processor.
*All* peripherals are above the first 4 GB - that cannot be changed
if you use this CPU chip.
In general, the solution is to use "struct resource" to carry physical
addresses and sizes. The basic type is:
#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
typedef u64 phys_addr_t;
#else
typedef u32 phys_addr_t;
#endif
and for this processor, we use u64 rather than u32.
So, if we want to make UIO usable on this class of CPU, we might
replace:
struct uio_mem {
unsigned long addr;
unsigned long size;
int memtype;
void __iomem *internal_addr;
struct uio_map *map;
};
with:
struct uio_mem {
phys_addr_t addr;
phys_addr_t size;
int memtype;
void __iomem *internal_addr;
struct uio_map *map;
};
A few other changes would be needed. We'd have to use something
other than
return sprintf(buf, "0x%lx\n", mem->addr);
because the format would be incorrect for a u64. Also, I believe
we would get warnings in uio_vma_fault(). However, the phys_addr
is really only applicable to UIO_MEM_PHYS, so perhaps we want a
union of phys_addr_t and unsigned long for addr and size?
Anyway, this is a real problem for the PPC440EPx, that board
designers cannot work around.
Steve
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-02 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-02 13:20 Steven A. Falco [this message]
2009-06-16 3:25 ` UIO: uio_mem does not handle devices above 4 GB address Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-01 17:20 Herrera-Bendezu, Luis
2009-04-01 20:10 ` Hans J. Koch
2009-04-01 21:01 ` Herrera-Bendezu, Luis
2009-04-01 21:54 ` Hans J. Koch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D4BB9F.8050903@harris.com \
--to=sfalco@harris.com \
--cc=hjk@linutronix.de \
--cc=lherrera@harris.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox