From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764551AbZDBQqA (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:46:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762274AbZDBQpe (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:45:34 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:41258 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753162AbZDBQpc (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:45:32 -0400 Message-ID: <49D4EB84.6020100@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:44:52 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boaz Harrosh CC: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , open-osd mailing-list , James Bottomley , Linux Kernel , linux-scsi , linux-fsdevel , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Request for pulling exofs for 2.6.30 References: <49D4E70A.9090507@panasas.com> In-Reply-To: <49D4E70A.9090507@panasas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Boaz Harrosh wrote: > which is available in the git repository at: > > git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd.git for-linus > > Boaz Harrosh (9): > exofs: Kbuild, Headers and osd utils > exofs: file and file_inode operations > exofs: symlink_inode and fast_symlink_inode operations > exofs: address_space_operations > exofs: dir_inode and directory operations > exofs: super_operations and file_system_type > exofs: export_operations > exofs: Documentation > fs: Add exofs to Kernel build For what little weight I have in this area... ACK But I would suggest _not_ splitting up the add-filesystem patch. You really only want to split up this stuff for review. The add-exofs change is one single logical change, and splitting it up across multiple changesets is not the most optimal nor bisect-safe approach. Jeff