From: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf_counter: move the event overflow output bits to record_type
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:33:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D53D2B.30108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090402091319.151921176@chello.nl>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Per suggestion from Paul, move the event overflow bits to record_type
> and sanitize the enums a bit.
>
> Breaks the ABI -- again ;-)
>
[snip]
With this patch, the definitions look like this now:
[snip]
/*
* Bits that can be set in hw_event.record_type to request information
* in the overflow packets.
*/
enum perf_counter_record_format {
PERF_RECORD_IP = 1U << 0,
PERF_RECORD_TID = 1U << 1,
PERF_RECORD_GROUP = 1U << 2,
PERF_RECORD_CALLCHAIN = 1U << 3,
};
[snip]
enum perf_event_type {
PERF_EVENT_MMAP = 1,
PERF_EVENT_MUNMAP = 2,
/*
* Half the event type space is reserved for the counter overflow
* bitfields, as found in hw_event.record_type.
*
* These events will have types of the form:
* PERF_EVENT_COUNTER_OVERFLOW { | __PERF_EVENT_* } *
*/
PERF_EVENT_COUNTER_OVERFLOW = 1UL << 31,
__PERF_EVENT_IP = PERF_RECORD_IP,
__PERF_EVENT_TID = PERF_RECORD_TID,
__PERF_EVENT_GROUP = PERF_RECORD_GROUP,
__PERF_EVENT_CALLCHAIN = PERF_RECORD_CALLCHAIN,
};
[snip]
Unless I'm misreading something here, there's overlap in the enum values
of perf_event_type enum. PERF_EVENT_MMAP has the same value as
__PERF_EVENT_IP, and PERF_EVENT_MUNMAP has the same value as
__PERF_EVENT_TID.
Are these lower bits being reused when PERF_EVENT_COUNTER_OVERFLOW is
OR'd in, which would imply that PERF_EVENT_MMAP and PERF_EVENT_MUNMAP
are mutually exclusive with all of the PERF_EVENT_COUNTER_OVERFLOW values.
Actually, I don't really understand the purpose of the PERF_EVENT_MMAP
and PERF_EVENT_MUNMAP bits. My hazy understanding is that they are used
for finding the file, function and line number at overflow interrupt
time, but it's unclear to me what that has to do with mmap. I'll go
back and try to find the relevant patch notes again.
- Corey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-02 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-02 9:11 [PATCH 0/6] more perf_counter stuff Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 9:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf_counter: move the event overflow output bits to record_type Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 11:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 12:03 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 22:33 ` Corey Ashford [this message]
2009-04-02 23:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] " Corey Ashford
2009-04-03 6:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-03 7:30 ` Corey Ashford
2009-04-02 9:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] RFC perf_counter: singleshot support Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 12:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 21:23 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-02 12:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 18:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 18:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 9:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf_counter: per event wakeups Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 11:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 12:03 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 9:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf_counter: kerneltop: update to new ABI Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 12:03 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 13:35 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-02 13:59 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-02 18:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 18:22 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-02 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 18:38 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-02 19:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 18:51 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-02 18:32 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-02 9:12 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf_counter: add more context information Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 11:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 18:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 18:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 18:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 18:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 12:04 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-03 12:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-03 18:25 ` Corey Ashford
2009-04-06 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 18:53 ` Corey Ashford
2009-04-06 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 20:16 ` Corey Ashford
2009-04-06 20:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 21:15 ` Corey Ashford
2009-04-06 21:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-06 21:33 ` Corey Ashford
2009-04-07 7:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-07 16:27 ` Corey Ashford
2009-04-02 9:12 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf_counter: update mmap() counter read Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 12:04 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D53D2B.30108@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox