public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/6] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64).c
@ 2009-04-04  8:45 Sergio Luis
  2009-04-04 21:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sergio Luis @ 2009-04-04  8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux-kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Pavel Machek, x86 Maintainers, Ingo Molnar

This patch series intends to unify the cpu_32.c and cpu_64.c files.

It's divided into 6 patches, that deal with the following:
#1 - unify headers
#2 - unify global variables
#3 - unify saving of processor state
#4 - unify restoring of processor state
#5 - unify copyright notes on the files
#6 - unify the files themselves, leaving only cpu.c

The code generated is _exactly_ the same as before, on both  i386 and
x86-64 architectures, so I don't expect this to introduce _any_ new bugs.
However, cleanups can be done in future, as for instance, the removal
of a few global variables in the 32 bit architecture. We are not dealing 
with those in this series.

The patches are against 2.6.29.

Thanks,

Sergio.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64).c
  2009-04-04  8:45 [PATCH 0/6] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64).c Sergio Luis
@ 2009-04-04 21:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-04-04 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sergio Luis
  Cc: Linux-kernel Mailing List, Pavel Machek, x86 Maintainers,
	Ingo Molnar

On Saturday 04 April 2009, Sergio Luis wrote:
> This patch series intends to unify the cpu_32.c and cpu_64.c files.
> 
> It's divided into 6 patches, that deal with the following:
> #1 - unify headers
> #2 - unify global variables
> #3 - unify saving of processor state
> #4 - unify restoring of processor state
> #5 - unify copyright notes on the files
> #6 - unify the files themselves, leaving only cpu.c
> 
> The code generated is _exactly_ the same as before, on both  i386 and
> x86-64 architectures, so I don't expect this to introduce _any_ new bugs.
> However, cleanups can be done in future, as for instance, the removal
> of a few global variables in the 32 bit architecture. We are not dealing 
> with those in this series.
> 
> The patches are against 2.6.29.

OK, you can add my ACK to the whole series.

Still, I wouldn't like it to go in before 2.6.30 final, because there are
enough deep changes related to suspend and resume already in the
Linus' tree.

Thanks,
Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-04 21:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-04  8:45 [PATCH 0/6] x86: unify power/cpu_(32|64).c Sergio Luis
2009-04-04 21:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox