From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/4] x86: MCE: Make polling timer interval per CPU
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:43:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DC1D7E.4010802@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090407150654.071D21D046E@basil.firstfloor.org>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Impact: bug fix
>
> The polling timer while running per CPU still uses a global next_interval
> variable, which lead to some CPUs either polling too fast or too slow.
> This was not a serious problem because all errors get picked up eventually,
> but it's still better to avoid it. Turn next_interval into a per cpu variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c 2009-04-07 16:09:57.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c 2009-04-07 16:43:16.000000000 +0200
> @@ -452,13 +452,14 @@
> */
>
> static int check_interval = 5 * 60; /* 5 minutes */
> -static int next_interval; /* in jiffies */
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, next_interval); /* in jiffies */
> static void mcheck_timer(unsigned long);
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct timer_list, mce_timer);
>
> static void mcheck_timer(unsigned long data)
> {
> struct timer_list *t = &per_cpu(mce_timer, data);
> + int *n;
>
> WARN_ON(smp_processor_id() != data);
>
> @@ -470,14 +471,14 @@
> * Alert userspace if needed. If we logged an MCE, reduce the
> * polling interval, otherwise increase the polling interval.
> */
> + n = &__get_cpu_var(next_interval);
> if (mce_notify_user()) {
> - next_interval = max(next_interval/2, HZ/100);
> + *n = max(*n/2, HZ/100);
> } else {
> - next_interval = min(next_interval * 2,
> - (int)round_jiffies_relative(check_interval*HZ));
> + *n = min(*n*2, (int)round_jiffies_relative(check_interval*HZ));
> }
>
> - t->expires = jiffies + next_interval;
> + t->expires = jiffies + *n;
> add_timer(t);
> }
>
> @@ -632,14 +633,14 @@
> static void mce_init_timer(void)
> {
> struct timer_list *t = &__get_cpu_var(mce_timer);
> + int *n = &__get_cpu_var(next_interval);
>
> - /* data race harmless because everyone sets to the same value */
> - if (!next_interval)
> - next_interval = check_interval * HZ;
> - if (!next_interval)
[plan A]
Add
if (!check_interval)
return;
Or...
> + if (!*n)
> + *n = check_interval * HZ;
> + if (!*n)
> return;
> setup_timer(t, mcheck_timer, smp_processor_id());
> - t->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + next_interval);
> + t->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + *n);
> add_timer(t);
> }
>
> @@ -907,7 +908,6 @@
> /* Reinit MCEs after user configuration changes */
> static void mce_restart(void)
> {
> - next_interval = check_interval * HZ;
> on_each_cpu(mce_cpu_restart, NULL, 1);
> }
>
[plan B]
Don't remove this line.
Take A or B, or we cannot stop polling timer by setting check_interval
to 0 via sysfs and then the timer will spin with 0 interval.
Thanks,
H.Seto
> @@ -1110,7 +1110,8 @@
> break;
> case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
> - t->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + next_interval);
> + t->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies +
> + __get_cpu_var(next_interval));
> add_timer_on(t, cpu);
> smp_call_function_single(cpu, mce_reenable_cpu, &action, 1);
> break;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-07 15:06 [PATCH] [0/4] x86: MCE: Machine check bug fix series for 2.6.30 Andi Kleen
2009-04-07 15:06 ` [PATCH] [1/4] x86: MCE: Make polling timer interval per CPU Andi Kleen
2009-04-08 3:43 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2009-04-08 10:43 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-08 11:30 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-08 11:40 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-09 10:28 ` [PATCH] [1/4] x86: MCE: Make polling timer interval per CPU v2 Andi Kleen
2009-04-07 15:06 ` [PATCH] [2/4] x86: MCE: Fix boot logging logic Andi Kleen
2009-04-07 15:06 ` [PATCH] [3/4] x86: MCE: Improve mce_get_rip Andi Kleen
2009-04-08 8:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-08 10:06 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-09 4:59 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-09 7:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-09 9:59 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-09 10:13 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-10 4:38 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-10 8:25 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-10 9:49 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-23 9:43 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-24 6:16 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-24 6:35 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-24 7:28 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-24 8:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-24 8:52 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-24 10:11 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-07 15:06 ` [PATCH] [4/4] x86: MCE: Fix EIPV behaviour with !PCC Andi Kleen
2009-04-23 9:43 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-23 20:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-24 8:35 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-24 0:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-24 1:11 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-24 5:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-24 8:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-24 10:30 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-24 16:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49DC1D7E.4010802@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox