From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760842AbZDJAsB (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:48:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756458AbZDJArs (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:47:48 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:47074 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753576AbZDJArr (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:47:47 -0400 Message-ID: <49DE9726.40007@garzik.org> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:47:34 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dgilbert@interlog.com CC: Mark Lord , Tejun Heo , Alan Cox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi , LKML Subject: Re: [PROPOSED] ata: Report 16/32bit PIO as best we can References: <20090409133221.18202.63779.stgit@t61.ukuu.org.uk> <49DDF1EB.2060200@rtr.ca> <49DDF744.1090209@garzik.org> <49DE9513.7050607@interlog.com> In-Reply-To: <49DE9513.7050607@interlog.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Douglas Gilbert wrote: > As for the freestanding ata_transport idea which transport > would a mvsas host adapter belong to which has one phy > connected to a SATA disk, another connected to a SAS disk and > a third one connected to a SAS expander with lots of SATA > disks the other side of that? Only the direct attach example would use ata_transport. Jeff