From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@suse.com>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [2.6.30-rc1-git2 regressions] Hibernation broken and (minor but annoying) audio problem
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:05:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E0F805.2090502@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904111253520.4583@localhost.localdomain>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> FWIW, I applied the appended patch and it fixed the problem for me.
>
> I think that patch is probably the right thing to do regardless, but I
> also think it doesn't obviate the need for also doing so at module loading
> time.
>
> I'm pretty sure that calling scsi_complete_async_scans() won't protect
> against an async USB bus scan, for example.
but neither does anything else we have in the kernel right now.......
(specifically, USB does not use the async infrastructure)
> But I do think your patch is probably worth doing anyway.
Absolutely; I wonder if we should make a more generic "wait for async storage scans"
function, that just calls this one, but allows other systems to also be in there.
(although.. right now I'd not know which ones it would be).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-11 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-09 22:57 [2.6.30-rc1-git2 regressions] Hibernation broken and (minor but annoying) audio problem Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-09 23:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-10 12:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-10 18:58 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-10 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-11 0:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-11 1:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-11 1:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-11 2:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-11 10:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-11 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-11 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-11 20:05 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-04-12 18:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-12 18:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-11 1:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-11 2:35 ` Len Brown
2009-04-11 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-11 19:00 ` Heinz Diehl
2009-04-11 19:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-11 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-11 20:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-11 20:18 ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2009-04-14 12:09 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-14 21:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-15 13:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-15 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-04-15 21:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-16 6:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-04-16 20:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E0F805.2090502@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@suse.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox