Re: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tracing, workqueuetrace: Make workqueue tracepoints use TRACE_EVENT macro

[Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>]

KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> hehe, I also have similar patch in my local patch queue ;)
>>
>>> +TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_insertion,
>>> +
>>> +	TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *wq_thread, struct work_struct *work),
>>> +
>>> +	TP_ARGS(wq_thread, work),
>>> +
>>> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
>>> +		__array(	char,			thread_comm,	TASK_COMM_LEN	)
>>> +		__field(	pid_t,			thread_pid			)
>>> +		__field(	struct work_struct *,	work				)
>>> +		__field(	work_func_t,		func				)
>>> +	),
> 
> and, your patch exceed 80 character in many lines.
> Please use checkpatch.pl script.
Hello, Kosaki-san

Thanks for your comments for this patch,
I'll merge your and other people's comments and send a V2.

About line exceed 80 characters, I do checkpatch before send, and I know that
lines in TP_STRUCT__entry are too long.
It it because I use similar format with other TRACE_EVENT definition.
Actually, I don't know why we need to add prefix and postfix TABs, and is it
necessary to use tab to make alignment for each fields.
Who can give me teach? or I will use different format to fix this 80-char problem.

Thanks
Zhaolei
> 
> 
> 
>