From: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
xemul@parallels.com, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu,
hch@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/30] cr: core stuff
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:52:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E424A3.60606@cs.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090413214701.GA24509@us.ibm.com>
Hi,
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@gmail.com):
>
> Hi Alexey,
>
> as far as I can see, the main differences between this patch and the
> equivalent in Oren's tree are:
>
> 1. kernel auto-selects container init to freeze
Actually, this eliminates the possibility to checkpoint a subtree of
tasks, which (under some obvious constraints) can be a handy feature.
> 2. kernel freezes tasks
IMHO better to do it in userspace - that way userspace can accomplish
other tasks while tasks are frozen, such as snapshot the filesystem,
or block/unblock the network.
Is there a good argument to do it kernel ?
> 3. no objhash taking references
> 4. no hbuf
> 5. always require CAP_SYS_ADMIN
I'm now convinced (thanks, Serge!) that it's better not to require
this unless we strictly have to.
Oren.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-14 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-10 2:35 [PATCH 10/30] cr: core stuff Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-10 9:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-10 11:43 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-10 16:19 ` Brian Haley
2009-04-13 8:10 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-13 21:47 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-04-14 5:52 ` Oren Laadan [this message]
2009-04-14 15:29 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-04-14 16:37 ` "partial" container checkpoint Dave Hansen
2009-04-14 17:30 ` Kevin Fox
2009-04-15 0:06 ` Paul Menage
2009-04-14 15:27 ` [PATCH 10/30] cr: core stuff Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-14 15:41 ` Dave Hansen
2009-04-14 16:57 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-14 15:41 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-04-14 16:48 ` Dave Hansen
2009-04-14 17:00 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-14 17:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-14 17:23 ` checkpoint/restart: taking refcounts on kernel objects Dave Hansen
2009-05-01 12:56 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-14 17:43 ` [PATCH 10/30] cr: core stuff Oren Laadan
2009-04-14 5:22 ` Oren Laadan
2009-04-14 16:00 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-14 16:39 ` Dave Hansen
2009-04-14 17:28 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-14 18:19 ` Oren Laadan
2009-04-14 19:00 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-04-14 19:26 ` Oren Laadan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E424A3.60606@cs.columbia.edu \
--to=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox