* [PATCH 2/2] rcupdate: use struct ref_completion
@ 2009-04-15 3:18 Lai Jiangshan
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2009-04-15 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Paul E. McKenney, LKML
Impact: Cleanup
The comment in _rcu_barrier() is a little mysterious,
this fix uses the generic waiting-multi-events APIs instead.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index 2c7b845..82f1dc4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -53,9 +53,8 @@ enum rcu_barrier {
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_head, rcu_barrier_head) = {NULL};
-static atomic_t rcu_barrier_cpu_count;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex);
-static struct completion rcu_barrier_completion;
+static struct ref_completion rcu_barrier_completion;
int rcu_scheduler_active __read_mostly;
/*
@@ -96,8 +95,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
{
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
- complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
+ ref_completion_put(&rcu_barrier_completion);
}
/*
@@ -108,7 +106,7 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct rcu_head *head = &per_cpu(rcu_barrier_head, cpu);
- atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
+ ref_completion_get(&rcu_barrier_completion);
switch ((enum rcu_barrier)type) {
case RCU_BARRIER_STD:
call_rcu(head, rcu_barrier_callback);
@@ -133,21 +131,12 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(enum rcu_barrier type)
BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
/* Take cpucontrol mutex to protect against CPU hotplug */
mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
- init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
- /*
- * Initialize rcu_barrier_cpu_count to 1, then invoke
- * rcu_barrier_func() on each CPU, so that each CPU also has
- * incremented rcu_barrier_cpu_count. Only then is it safe to
- * decrement rcu_barrier_cpu_count -- otherwise the first CPU
- * might complete its grace period before all of the other CPUs
- * did their increment, causing this function to return too
- * early.
- */
- atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 1);
+
+ ref_completion_get_init(&rcu_barrier_completion);
on_each_cpu(rcu_barrier_func, (void *)type, 1);
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
- complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
- wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
+ ref_completion_put_init(&rcu_barrier_completion);
+ ref_completion_wait(&rcu_barrier_completion);
+
mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
wait_migrated_callbacks();
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-04-15 3:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-15 3:18 [PATCH 2/2] rcupdate: use struct ref_completion Lai Jiangshan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox