From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Linux USB kernel mailing list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: USB storage no-boot regression (bisected)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:46:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E5E541.6090108@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090415050947.GB3462@kroah.com>
Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:35:59PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> Like Arjan said, this is because we are initializing faster now, and
>>> things are a bit more asynchronous. Use the root_delay boot option,
>>> that's what I use for my USB-based systems, and have not had a problem
>>> with that at all.
>> Is that solution really scalable to every user with a regression severe
>> enough it prevents them from booting?
>>
>> When did regressions become an acceptable tradeoff for speed?
>
> So, we aren't allowed to go faster?
Well, when the result fails to boot, you are only going faster to a point :)
Oh well...
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-15 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-14 21:06 USB storage no-boot regression (bisected) Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 1:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 2:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 2:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 2:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 3:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 8:40 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-15 1:49 ` Greg KH
2009-04-15 2:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 2:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 5:09 ` Greg KH
2009-04-15 13:46 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2009-04-15 14:25 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-15 14:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 15:37 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-15 19:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 21:55 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-16 1:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-16 2:14 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-16 2:54 ` Greg KH
2009-04-16 10:51 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-16 13:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-16 13:49 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-16 2:17 ` Hal Murray
2009-04-16 3:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15 15:01 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-15 15:47 ` Alan Stern
2009-04-15 15:49 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-15 17:06 ` VomLehn
2009-04-15 17:32 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-15 20:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-04-15 20:20 ` VomLehn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E5E541.6090108@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox